Re: Yes Science Needs God
From: Bjoern Feuerbacher (feuerbac_at_thphys.uni-heidelberg.de)
Date: 08/27/04
- Next message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: GR Math Predicts a Black Hole At a Big Bang"
- Previous message: Myxococcus xanthus: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- In reply to: Mitchell: "Re: Yes Science Needs God"
- Next in thread: Scot McDermid: "Re: Yes Science Needs God"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:12:44 +0200
Mitchell wrote:
> "robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote in message news:<2p5pudFgddgiU3@uni-berlin.de>...
>
>>Mitchell wrote:
>>
>>>Science says a mindless lump created this universe. But who created
>>>that so called "singularity?" Science won't admit God even when faced
>>>with Him.
>>>Mitch Raemsch
>>
>>And which God created God. Did He create himself? The concept is
>>empirically unsuportable, there for it must be expelled from science.
>>
>>Bob Kolker
>
>
> The universe needs to be created. That is obvious.
Why is that obvious?
> God doesn't.
Why? Special pleading.
> Your just another slimeball atheist trying to leave God out.
> Well you can't.
Would you please try to discuss this with Franco?
> Tell me that a mindless lump is responsible for the intelligence
> behind the universe(science).
You have presented no evidence so far that there is "intelligenc behind
the universe".
> Just try it. You'll make a fool out of yourself.
No, we leave that to you. You are very good at it.
Bye,
Bjoern
- Next message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: GR Math Predicts a Black Hole At a Big Bang"
- Previous message: Myxococcus xanthus: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- In reply to: Mitchell: "Re: Yes Science Needs God"
- Next in thread: Scot McDermid: "Re: Yes Science Needs God"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
