Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS
From: George Hammond (research137_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 08/29/04
- Next message: greywolf42: "Re: Reflections on Aether"
- Previous message: Morituri-Max: "Re: 1c+1c Light and matter"
- In reply to: Liberator Veritatis: "Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS"
- Next in thread: Scot McDermid: "Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS"
- Reply: Scot McDermid: "Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 18:42:33 GMT
"Liberator Veritatis" <LiberatorVeritatis@houston.rr.com> wrote in message
news:p282j0t4nia685f6n5akep34rkfslru0ak@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 14:15:39 GMT, "George Hammond"
> <research137@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Liberator Veritatis" <LiberatorVeritatis@houston.rr.com> wrote in
message
> >news:0mqvi05q1ehek99qgjf4gfcfc1o0sqno77@4ax.com...
> >
> >
> >> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:00:53 GMT, "George Hammond"
> >> <research137@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> ><snip>
> >
> >
> >> Well, let us just suppose everything you say is true. It proves that
> >> god does not exist. It shows that our beliefs about god are entirely
> >> the result of the fact that we live inside a gravitational field. If
> >> there was no (or very little) curvature to space (i.e. no gravity) or
> >> perhaps a completely different curvature, then it follows from what
> >> you say that we would have no notions of god or have completely
> >> different notions than the ones we have had about a god.
> >
> >[Hammond]
> >There is no doubt that if "Heaven descended to Earth" we would
> >no longer have to worry about God. So your statement is true.
> >However, it is prefaced with the word *IF* and the "if" happens
> >not to be true... so your statment while interesting and in fact
> >"relevant" to some extent (it explains what 'kingdom come is')
> >it is in fact IRRELEVANT to the discussion at hand because
> >in fact.... God is still living in Heaven, not Earth.
> >
>
> What?!? What I am saying is that if we were born and raised in outer
> space, for instance, with no gravity then no one would ever have
> brought up the notion of god according to what you say. Or, if we had
> always lived in a much stronger gravitational filed we might have come
> up with some other notion completely different from god according to
> what YOU say. How is it that this being a fact implies that god
> exists? If anything, it suggests otherwise.
[Hammond]
Hey.. you actually have to READ a theory to know what you
are actually talking about:
1. God is NOT caused by terrestrial Gravity.
2. God is not caused by Gravity in outer space.
3. God IS caused by "quantum brain Gravity" which
causes a "classical gravitational curvature" in
Psychometry space.
>
> You must have misinterpreted what I am saying.
[Hammond]
No......... VICE VERSA..... is more the case.
> "Gravity created god," isn't even what you
> are claiming. You are claiming that gravity created our BELIEF in
> god.
[Hammond]
WRONG......... you don't know what you are talking about.
Please write on the black board 25 times
the following statement.... memorize it!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"God is a modification of "visual reality" caused by
the brain, NOT and "idea" caused by the brain"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Until you MEMORIZE that statement, you don't know
what is being discussed here.
> Liberator Veritatis
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
1st mirror site:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
2nd mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
new site (under construction):
http://home.comcast.net/~proof-of-god
====================================
- Next message: greywolf42: "Re: Reflections on Aether"
- Previous message: Morituri-Max: "Re: 1c+1c Light and matter"
- In reply to: Liberator Veritatis: "Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS"
- Next in thread: Scot McDermid: "Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS"
- Reply: Scot McDermid: "Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
