Re: My suggestion for scientific units.
From: Tom Roberts (tjroberts_at_lucent.com)
Date: 08/30/04
- Next message: Earle Jones: "Re: Taking precautions during experimenting"
- Previous message: Bruce Richmond: "Re: Query about simultaneous events.."
- In reply to: Xman: "My suggestion for scientific units."
- Next in thread: FrediFizzx: "Re: My suggestion for scientific units."
- Reply: FrediFizzx: "Re: My suggestion for scientific units."
- Reply: ueb: "Re: My suggestion for scientific units."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 03:20:10 GMT
Xman wrote:
> We set c = 1, h/2pi = 1 , mass of neutron = 1
Better: c=1, h/2pi=1, 8piG=1. This last is, of course, for the same
reason as the first two: to make the fundamental equations of physics
simpler (as we know them today).
Some prefer G=1 for the third.
These units have stood the test of time, and have been used for many
decades by most theoretical physicists.
Tom Roberts tjroberts@lucent.com
- Next message: Earle Jones: "Re: Taking precautions during experimenting"
- Previous message: Bruce Richmond: "Re: Query about simultaneous events.."
- In reply to: Xman: "My suggestion for scientific units."
- Next in thread: FrediFizzx: "Re: My suggestion for scientific units."
- Reply: FrediFizzx: "Re: My suggestion for scientific units."
- Reply: ueb: "Re: My suggestion for scientific units."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|