Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS
From: George Hammond (research137_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 08/30/04
- Next message: suzysewnshow: "Re: definition of a clock in relativity theory"
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: Reflections on Aether"
- In reply to: Scot McDermid: "Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS"
- Next in thread: Scot McDermid: "Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS"
- Reply: Scot McDermid: "Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:16:26 GMT
"Scot McDermid" <scotmc@optNOSPAMonline.net> wrote in message
news:gBDYc.16129$Es2.7824278@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
>
> "George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:tspYc.203496$8_6.92538@attbi_s04...
> > [Hammond]
>
> > Please write on the black board 25 times
> > the following statement.... memorize it!!
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > "God is a modification of "visual reality" caused by
> > the brain, NOT and "idea" caused by the brain"
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > -
> >
> > Until you MEMORIZE that statement, you don't know
> > what is being discussed here.
>
> MEMORIZE that statement but don't try to EVALUATE IT.
> See, if you start to evaluate it you might think :
> If God is a modification caused by the brain THEN
> God does not exist in His own right.
> But if you thought that then that would disagree with Hammond.
> So that is wrong.
> In another post, Hammond wrote that the statement above is
> [words to the effect] for pedants who can't understand a more
> precise statement. That is, George says you can't play
> 'phi-law-sophie" and pick that statement apart for details.
[Hammond]
Ok McDermid.... ignore my other reply to your message...
here is a more pithy one. Allow me to concoct another
one-liner definition of God.... one which you should have
less trouble "evaluating"... simply because it references
the ACTUAL SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY (God=G_uv)
which has been made:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Human sensory reality is a CURVED VERSION of actual
physical reality. Because this Curvature causes a
"noticeable supernatural difference" between the two... it has
been called "God" for 3,500 years. Scientifically then, it
has been discovered that God=G_uv, where G_uv is the
Einstein-Curvature of "sensory reality".
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now... lets hear your "evaluation" of that "definition" of God.
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
1st mirror site:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
2nd mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
new site (under construction):
http://home.comcast.net/~proof-of-god
====================================
- Next message: suzysewnshow: "Re: definition of a clock in relativity theory"
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: Reflections on Aether"
- In reply to: Scot McDermid: "Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS"
- Next in thread: Scot McDermid: "Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS"
- Reply: Scot McDermid: "Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|