Re: What's up with gravity wave detection?

From: Eric Flesch (eric_at_flesch.org)
Date: 09/02/04 

Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 08:34:05 GMT

I don't propose to get into a rigorous technical discussion, "Bilge"
-- that is your area of specialty. I have just two things to say:

(1) If QM and QED had been developed *before* GR, then nobody would
be using stress-tensors to describe light today. Why be ruled by an
accident of history?

(2) The experiment which you yourself described would test the
hypothesis admirably. The question is, does "in-flight" radiation
have weight? A device can be built with an emitter in a small
container, with a hatch which can be opened to allow light to beam
into an external mirrored container. The whole assembly is enclosed
and placed on a (very sensitive) weighing scale. When the hatch is
open the whole assembly should weigh less than when the hatch is
closed.

This experiment is doable with today's technology. A falsifiable
hypothesis and a practical experiment: what more would you want,
"Bilge"? And if it does indeed weigh less when the hatch is open, I'd
love to see your rigorous technical explanation of that.

cheers,
Eric

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Whats up with gravity wave detection?
    ... I don't propose to get into a rigorous technical discussion, "Bilge" ... into an external mirrored container. ... When the hatch is ... And if it does indeed weigh less when the hatch is open, ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Whats up with gravity wave detection?
    ... I don't propose to get into a rigorous technical discussion, "Bilge" ... into an external mirrored container. ... When the hatch is ... And if it does indeed weigh less when the hatch is open, ...
    (sci.physics)
Quantcast