Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation

From: George Hammond (research137_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/03/04 

Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 22:43:30 +0000 (UTC)

"Thomas H. Faller" <faller@sgi.com> wrote in message
news:41386488.505D58EC@sgi.com...

> George Hammond wrote:
>
> > "Thomas H. Faller" <faller@sgi.com> wrote in message
> > news:413751D8.B948A3C8@sgi.com...
> > > Matt Silberstein wrote:
> > >

<snip>

> > > After reading several of his responses, I thought that there might be
> > > something basic in his paper that would lend itself to an easy
> > > refutation - perhaps something in his physics, his math or the
> > > psychology definitions.
> >
> > [Hammond]
> > That's what every half ass pedant like you thinks.
> > Chris Isham even thought that.
> > After they fall flat on their face looking, then they
> > resort to the old pedant refrain:
>
> Well, it's pretty obvious by your track record here that you're not
interested
> in defending your ideas, you're just here to get abused and to try and
> reply in clever insults. You don't bother to go into details, you just
> quote blocks of text from your self-aggrandizing promotions over and
> over. Why don't you get tired of this now instead of later and save us
> all some typing?

[Hammond]
Look.... the only person who ever showed up that knows anything
is Aardpig the astrophysicist.... the only guy who knows what
G_uv actually is (you don't for instance). And what does he do...
begins by insulting me and then makes a flagrent mathmatical
error which I immediatley pointed out and insulted him back.
    As for the rest of you kooks.... you don''t even know what you're
talking about..

>

> You don't have a paper, George. You just have a bunch of paragraphs
> strung together. You said that you had to edit your submission to the
> Noetic Journal extensively just to get it published. I shudder to think
> what inanities it had in its original form.

[Hammond]
Hey... duede... were not interested in halfass tripe from some
stumblebum like you who doesn't even have a degree in
physics.

> > > And the hairbrained idea that a difference in brain size reflects
> > > a difference in world perception is so trivially wrong that it makes
> > > taking any of it seriously very difficult.
> >
> > [Hammond]
> > Every statment you make is DEMONSTRABLY IGNORANT.
> > For chrissakes, Third World malnutrition growth stunting
> > reaches 30, 40 even 50% in some cases and is chronic in
> > some regions. A tape measure is actually wrapped around
> > the poor wreches head to estimate his IQ... by workers
> > from the Red Cross, UNICEF and the WHO.
> > Your pathetic.
>
> It is trivially wrong in that you haven't demonstrated that there is a
> difference in world perception tied to brain size,

[Hammond]
WRONG.. it's trivial to PROVE IT. Intelligence is mental speed
in bits/second. Intelligence increases linearly from 0 to 1800 for
the first 18 years of your life. This means your "perceptual world"
gets SLOWER for the first 18 years of your life!
  Physics takes reality to be "time and space itself". Your
"mental clock" is KNOWN to increase speed for the first 18 years
of you life. Also, since you are only 1 mm in size when you are born
and 6 feet tall when you reach 18.. your "personal ruler" dilates
for the first 18 years of your life... meaning the world
gets SMALLER for the first 18 years of your life. ALL DUE TO
TO GROWTH!!
  So don't tell me "world perception" of "time and space itself"
isn't tied to "brain size", any idiot knows it is.

> and you would need
> to measure this quantity of "world perception" and then show that
> it meets your expectations with regard to women vs. men, savants
> vs. the profoundly retarded, and differences within the normal
> population. You are apparently unaware that the normal range of
> brain size encompasses the upper range of Homo Neanderthals.
> You don't seem to realize that psychologists have decided that
> despite the difference in total growth since earlier times, there
> has been no real change in intelligence over recorded history.

[Hammond]
Get outta here.. you're just a mindless pedant who reads books
and can't see the forrest for the trees.

> Tom Faller

[Hammond]
I do know if you don't wash those dirty dishes
in the sink they'll be hard and sticky by morning.
Get moving.

====================================
   SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
        1st mirror site:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
        2nd mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
     new site (under construction):
http://home.comcast.net/~proof-of-god
====================================

Relevant Pages

  • Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQs OVER 150
    ... > intelligence is related to brain size has been disproven. ... this is caused by brain growth... ... When you begin life you have "zero intelligence" ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
    ... Tensor Calculus and find out what God is.... ... >> the SPoG gains worldwide recognition. ... > behavour and life as we know it. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQs OVER 150
    ... The evidence that there is is just as consistent with the ... >> of his life. ... I, like many others, do not believe in God or eternal life. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
    ... >> Stop being a pedant. ... "Eigenvectors" are a physical fact, ... The "eigenvectors" of ALL PERSONALITY CPORRELATION ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv A CHRISTMAS MESSAGE
    ... Only an aggravated pedant and soft core heretic would ... public care anything for the disputes of heretics and pedants. ... SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)