Re: What before big bang?

From: hanson (hanson_at_quick.net)
Date: 09/06/04 

Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 06:49:32 GMT

"Dale Trynor" <dalet@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote in message
news:waT_c.122891$Np3.5240318@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> TomGee wrote:
> > Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote
>
[Dale Trynor]
> Oddly enough this alternative theory dose predict that the surfaces of
> white holes would be a sort of boundary. Oddly it also results in a
> hypothesis that if space must continue to expand beyond what this
> surface area could contain, then it might result in what would appear
> like disconnected white holes even while in reality they are of the one
> single surface.
>
[hanson]
Yo, Dale, que passo? I didn't follow this thread here but your term
"white holes" caught my eye. There is/was a French dude, forgot his
name, who published and promoted in SST/Elsevier ca 1976 a theory
by name of ~ "Bright Cosmology". Check him out. IIRC he reason along
the same lines you do. If I see/remember/ come across it I'll post the
details. -- Never forget Dale, that all those cosmology theories are born
out of/from INTERPRETATIONS of the flickering light of distant stars......
Cosmology is essentially just fancy & captivating story telling....
but by all means it's not an issue to get into each others hair over.
There's no money in it unless you can sit behind a huge telescope
and belong to the astro-incrowd. --- ENJOY it, dream it -- *** the rest!
ahahahaha.....ahahahanson

Quantcast