Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation

From: David Jensen (david_at_dajensen-family.com)
Date: 09/08/04 

Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 04:15:56 +0000 (UTC)

In alt.talk.creationism, "George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com>
wrote in <kqidnSTfabSTGaPcRVn-vA@comcast.com>:
>
>"David Jensen" <david@dajensen-family.com> wrote in message
>news:leasj01gm1ujbdk39n718fkcgesu5qmi54@4ax.com...
>> In alt.talk.creationism, "George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com>
>> wrote in <4e2dnfv4WtbmkaPcRVn-jA@comcast.com>:
>> >
>> >"David Jensen" <david@dajensen-family.com> wrote in message
>> >news:buupj0lr84g98d43odvofmcoin3aa1235j@4ax.com...
>> >> In alt.talk.creationism, "George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com>
>> >> wrote in <SfWdnepwAPAoTKHcRVn-vg@comcast.com>:
>> >> >
>> >> ...
>> >> >[Hammond]
>> >> > SAME THING GOES FOR THE SPOG
>> >> >
>> >> >If you want to set up a Psychometry laboratory and REPEAT the 100
>> >> >years of Psychometry experiments that prove the spog, then go ahead,
>> >> >no one is stopping you. Any lame brain can see however that it is
>> >> >unnecessary.
>> >>
>> >> There is no scientific proof of god and there have been no studies done
>> >> to support your claim.
>> >
>> >[Hammond]
>> >LOL Unsupported assertion.
>>
>> Yet you have never taken the opportunity to provide evidence that I am
>> wrong. Strange.
>
>[Hammond]
>LOL.
> All the experimental evidence is meticulously cited in
>(Author, date) format in my peer/published papers copies of which
>are posted on my website at:
>http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/Hammond5s1.html
>and
>http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/cart.html

Yes, I can read what you have written. What I am unable to do is find
any sense in the words as they were strung together. This is because you
failed to put sense into the words when you put them on paper. It
appears to me that the paper itself is your psychology experiment, since
there is no reference to any actual studies that support in any
meaningful way the conclusion of your paper.

>Obviously you are either unqualified to read them, or have some
>physical handicap, such as blindness that prevents you from
>reading them.

Yes, you would think so, since you are physically incapable of
acknowledging any errors that you have made. Are you related to GWBush?

>Strange.

Not as strange as some of the Markov chains I discovered in your paper.

>Quit reposting your Teletubbie lies over and over again.

Call them what you like.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: interesting look at global warming
    ... It does consider experimental evidence however. ... known which one of the predictions will be the most accurate one. ... The answer being you can't produce a single prediction of climate science regarding future temperatures which is more accurate than extrapolation. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: In Case of Doubt
    ... unreasonable standard of evidence. ... Answer for question is experimental evidence from cyclotrons and answer are a bazillion detailed measurements to 10 or more places of accuracy. ... carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has risen. ... The numbers are retrofitted in to make the correct amount of warming; if the models produce far too much warming or far too little then they are either rejected or twweaked until they show the amount which matches historical warming. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Apogee mini dac or Benchmark DAC1
    ... I do find it strange, though, that simply asking for someone to give ... evidence or details of what they say is taken by Andy as trying to ... is peppered with famous and acrimonious personal conflicts based ...
    (uk.rec.audio)
  • Re: Sky and Tels anti-bible editorial
    ... The evidence is mostly circumstantial, and any prosecutor will tell you ... it's pretty hard to make a case without hard evidence. ... current experimental evidence that validates evolutionary precepts? ... it might be best for the proponents of evolution to ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: nuclear shell model periodic table
    ... in which there is no experimental evidence for the shell model ... >> fo rthe shell model of any lanthanoid and any shell and subshell ... > lanthanoids have been shown experimentally. ...
    (sci.physics)