Re: Gamma Function

From: Marcus Wellpoth (wellpoth_at_gmx.de)
Date: 09/09/04


Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 06:15:04 +0200

YBM wrote:

> Androcles a écrit :
>> Roberts' paranoia is scarcely justified when there is a tracable source.
>> I put the code through a debugger and it's clean.
>
> How could anyone believe that *you* are able to use a debugger ?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, using a debugger is surely the simplest thing on earth.
But does he know what the assembler he gets really means?
mw



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Gamma Function
    ... >> Roberts' paranoia is scarcely justified when there is a tracable source. ... >> I put the code through a debugger and it's clean. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Gamma Function
    ... > Roberts' paranoia is scarcely justified when there is a tracable source. ... > I put the code through a debugger and it's clean. ... How could anyone believe that *you* are able to use a debugger? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Application.Exit()
    ... terminate--the debugger doesn't fully shut down, ... there is something "hanging on" somewhere. ... When I look in Settings/System/Memory/Running Programs nothing appears. ... forgotten to clean up properly? ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.compactframework)