Re: Dirk's doubly secret "proof" that he can't show anyone...

From: Dennis McCarthy (djmenck_at_aol.com)
Date: 09/10/04 

Date: 10 Sep 2004 23:46:18 GMT

>>
>> Dirk, please forgive me, but do you think such childish convinces anyone?
>Read
>> closely: I, Dennis McCarthy, will bet you $1000 that you are wrong

Dirk:
>No, stupid.

Dennis: I predicted you'd back down.

Dirk; There is no one to convince of anything.
>Read even more closely: unlike you, I was not born yesterday.
>No way that I'm just gonna *tell* you how I found out, and
>how I can prove it. You perfectly know why.
>I'll give you 1 little hint: you really did your best, but you gave
>yourself away. For the first part, use the archives - it's all there.
>When you guess right, I'll let you know - that is a promise.
>And then, if you insist, you can pay me whatever you think
>is appropriate. Now go to work - try harder.

Dennis: As I predicted, you'd back down on the wager -- and continue to say
"guess how I did it." You will never state the proof as everyone knows because
you don't have it.
   Your response is the type of childish fall back that you use every time you
are challenged. As I wrote to you in a previous correspondence, this is
exactly like the guy who claimed he had found errors in certain peer reviewed
papers that disagreed with his viewpoint. When asked what they were, he said,
well, why don't you see if you can find them yourself. It could not be more
grammar school.
Quite simply, you lied.
I'm obviously not Sue as we follow completely different theories, believe very
different things, have different styles, etc., you oh, so interesting person.
So you don't have proof.
That is why you refuse to post it.
And everyone knows it.

--Dennis

PS. This response by Dirk is just too rich: "Read even more closely: unlike
you, I was not born yesterday. No way that I'm just gonna *tell* you how I
found out, and
how I can prove it. You perfectly know why."
If I wanted to respond in the same juvenile manner: "Well, I have proof that
you, Dirk, crafted all this during a brief stint at a mental hospital when you
were under serious medication. I have absolute proof of this. But I don't want
to provide the proof right now for rather obvious reasons of which you are well
aware."
It's pathetic. It's weasel-like. It's an effort to libel while using a farcical
excuse to avoid furnishing any sort of evidence for the claim.

As ever,
Dennis

Dennis McCarthy

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Frisst and cheer Skirts
    ... If Dirk says I am supposed to be this guy then sew be it. ... IMHO I look better than Dennis ... ... Exposing Bush and His "Techniques of Deceit" ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Query about simultaneous events..
    ... Dirk, my friend, ... If you're gonna confuse me with Dennis then teach him how use "symbols ... And also give him my appologies for making him look like a misspelling ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Permittivity and the Poynting vector
    ... Frankly I don't like you're tone (Dirk) when you address Sue, ... and you're screwing me up by calling her dennis. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: GPS vs. Source Dependency
    ... >> At least you're consistant in you delusions. ... > Dirk Vdm ... Do you see "Dennis" in the subject line of this thread? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: GPS vs. Source Dependency
    ... >> At least you're consistant in you delusions. ... > Dirk Vdm ... Do you see "Dennis" in the subject line of this thread? ...
    (sci.physics)
Quantcast