Re: Gamma Function

From: Marcus Wellpoth (wellpoth_at_gmx.de)
Date: 09/11/04 

Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 06:20:38 +0200

Eric Gisse wrote:

> On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:20:07 +0200, Marcus Wellpoth <wellpoth@gmx.de>
> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>> Your have to be one of the most stupidest cunts I've ever has the
>>> misfortune to encounter, second only to the fumble mumbler.
>>> Don't bother to reply, I won't be reading it.
>>> *plonk*
>>> Androcles.
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [snip]
>
> Look what you made him do.
>
> Another person plonked. I think he posts here only so that he and
> Henri Wilson can fellate eachother in public. Everyone else gets
> "plonked".
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have made fun of because it's very careless to analyse a virus with a
debugger alone. Small uncomplicated viruses might be analysed using a
debugger,
but they fail if you got sophisticated and/or polymorphic viruses.
Also there is a probability the virus takes over while being analysed with a
debugger. And even the disassembling has to be done in multiple steps,
with recompilations to see if the source file compiles back into the
original virus. All in all this is a complicated process and sometimes very
timeconsuming.
I wouldn't trust Androcles analytical abilities on this one, not after i
have seen what he made out of the 'electrodynamics of moving bodies'.
Do you remember the seven deadly sins of relativity(chuckle)?
mw