Re: Gamma Function
From: Bilge (dubious_at_radioactivex.lebesque-al.net)
Date: 09/11/04
- Next message: Paul B. Andersen: "Re: GPS versus source dependency / ballistic theory"
- Previous message: Len Gaasenbeek: "Re: Why people post on a physics newsgroup."
- In reply to: YBM: "Re: Gamma Function"
- Next in thread: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Gamma Function"
- Reply: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Gamma Function"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 13:06:52 -0000
YBM:
>Androcles a écrit :
>> Roberts' paranoia is scarcely justified when there is a tracable source.
>> I put the code through a debugger and it's clean.
>
>How could anyone believe that *you* are able to use a debugger ?
Maybe to him, ``debugger'' means pulling his head out of his ass
(but I find that almost as hard to believe).
- Next message: Paul B. Andersen: "Re: GPS versus source dependency / ballistic theory"
- Previous message: Len Gaasenbeek: "Re: Why people post on a physics newsgroup."
- In reply to: YBM: "Re: Gamma Function"
- Next in thread: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Gamma Function"
- Reply: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Gamma Function"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
