Re: Energy from "nothing" - conflicts with law of preservation of energy?
From: Bill Hobba (bhobba_at_rubbish.net.au)
Date: 09/13/04
- Next message: Henri Wilson: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Previous message: Bill Hobba: "Re: Energy from "nothing" - conflicts with law of preservation of energy?"
- In reply to: Guck: "Re: Energy from "nothing" - conflicts with law of preservation of energy?"
- Next in thread: Barry OGrady: "Re: Energy from "nothing" - conflicts with law of preservation of energy?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 22:41:21 GMT
"Guck" <marcus4767@canada.com> wrote in message
news:e97cd51a.0409130151.730581c7@posting.google.com...
> twocrafts@hotmail.com (Tue Sorensen) wrote in message
news:<c50450f6.0409121850.71c1286a@posting.google.com>...
> > As mentioned here:
> >
> > http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/V/vacuum_energy_drive.html
> >
> > it might be possible to extract quite large amounts of energy from the
> > quantrum vacuum of empty space itself. Does this not contradict the
> > law of constant and conserved energy? If we could extract large
> > amounts of such energy, wouldn't we effectively have a means for a
> > perpetual motion machine?
> >
> > - Tue Sorensen
>
> What bothers me is the idea of charge. The fundamental charges of
> the electron as -1 and quarkes as +2/3 and -1/3. In the beginning of
> the Big Bang there were obviously no charges. At some point charges
> just appeared out of nothing. So what is a "charge" of a quark or an
> electron
> relative to the instant in the big bang when there were no charges?
> What happened in spacetime? What does a charge mean to the fate of the
> Universe?
Charge did not appear out of nothing in the sense it is not balanced ie
there in no net charge - which means there is an equal amount for positive
charge to negative charge. So you question is why does charge exist? Well
in science some things are accepted and charge may in fact be one of those
things - but strangely there is a more fundamental reason at work - namely
local QM gauge invariance - see
http://www.upscale.utoronto.ca/GeneralInterest/DBailey/SubAtomic/Lectures/LectF13/Lect13.htm.
Bill
>
> Guck
> Gary Marcus
> marcus4767@canada.com
- Next message: Henri Wilson: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Previous message: Bill Hobba: "Re: Energy from "nothing" - conflicts with law of preservation of energy?"
- In reply to: Guck: "Re: Energy from "nothing" - conflicts with law of preservation of energy?"
- Next in thread: Barry OGrady: "Re: Energy from "nothing" - conflicts with law of preservation of energy?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|