Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
From: George Hammond (nowhere_at_nomailspam.com)
Date: 09/14/04
- Next message: Harry: "Re: Is Lorentz contraction a real process"
- Previous message: Peter Kinane: "Re: Proposing Physics Experimentation with Eff. Premises"
- In reply to: stew dean: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Next in thread: Richard Forrest: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: Richard Forrest: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: stew dean: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 09:51:11 +0000 (UTC)
"stew dean" <stewart@webslave.dircon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:2b68957a.0409132352.74c7a10d@posting.google.com...
> "George Hammond" <nowhere@nomailspam.com> wrote in message
news:<GsedneBgjYGGzNvcRVn-gw@comcast.com>...
> > "stew dean" <stewart@webslave.dircon.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:2b68957a.0409131451.dea5cc3@posting.google.com...
> > > "George Hammond" <nowhere@nomailspam.com> wrote in message
> > news:<B82dnSm4IuvbwtjcRVn-pg@comcast.com>...
> > > > "stew dean" <stewart@webslave.dircon.co.uk> wrote in
> > > > message news:2b68957a.0409122328.4910c506@posting.google.com...
> > > >
> > > > [Stew Dean]
> > > > ....simply that there is no relationship between the arbitary N
> > > > dimentional space of the personality profiling and the non
> > > > arbitary N dimentional space of the universe.
> > > > Stew Dean
> >
> > > >
> > > > [Hammond]
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -
> > > > How real space (X-Y-Z) causes Psychometry space (E-N-P)
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -
> > > >
> > > > [Hammond]
> > > > Hey... I've answered this many times before.
> > > > Let me outline it step by step:
> > > >
> > > > 1. It is an experimental fact that real space has a
> > > > quadratic metric. This is why we say
> > > > "real space is Euclidean". "Euclidean" MEANS
> > > > "having a quadratic metric" e.g.:
> > > > dR^2 = dX^2 + dY^2 + dZ^2
> > > >
> > > > 2. This means that real space is a space of
> > > > "rigid body rotations". With any other metric
> > > > you could not rotate a rigid body in space without
> > > > rupturing it.
> > > >
> > > > 3. It is known that there exist only 3 "simple"
> > > > coordinate systems in Euclidean space:
> > > >
> > > > A. Cartesian
> > > > B. Polar/Cylindrical
> > > > C. Spherical
> > >
> > > Coordinate systems are man made it should be worth noting.
> >
> > [Hammond]
> > No they are not. The fact that there are "only 3 simple coordinate
> > systems, Cartesian, Polar, Spherical" in real space, is a
> > PHYSICAL FACT, not a matter of
> > ARBITRARY CONVENTION.
> > You do greatly err.
>
> No you are the one who made the mistake. Time and space has
> dimensions, probably around 11 or so according to the latest work.
> Time and space does not have a coordinate system, that is something we
> made up. For example the earth has a coordinate system but there is
> equator is no a physical line.
[Hammond]
No dimensions beyond 4 are of any interest whatsoever to
any "classical physics theory", and the SPoG is a
"classical physicis theory", end of that argument.
>
> You have confused the territory with the map.
[Hammond]
No... you don't know what you are talking about.
The METRICAL properties of Euclidean space
IS WHAT DETERMINES the FACT that only 3
"simple" coordinate systems exist in Euclidean
space: Cartesian, Polar/Cylindrical and Spherical.
The "Euclidean (quadratic) metric" is the ONLY
metric known to man that produces a space where
"rigid body rotations" are possible. No other metric
will, and this is why the "Cartesian, Polar/Cylindrical,
and Spherical" coordinates are the "3 simple coordinate
systems" of REAL SPACE.
This fact is actually PHYSICALLY MANIFESTED
in the "simple" shapes of common physical objects.
In particular this FACT explains why all animals and plants
have a "Cartesian Body Plan".
I.e. It is BECAUSE of the mertical structure of real space.
>From this, it is a direct chain of causality from "spacetime"
to "psychometric space", and hence from Gravity
to God, via Einstein's curvature theory of Gravity.
> Stew Dean
>
[Hammond]
Until you can understand that, which every physicist does,
you have nothing of any relevance to say about SPoG.
You're simply too uneducated scientifically.
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
1st mirror site:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
2nd mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
new site (under construction):
http://home.comcast.net/~proof-of-god
====================================
- Next message: Harry: "Re: Is Lorentz contraction a real process"
- Previous message: Peter Kinane: "Re: Proposing Physics Experimentation with Eff. Premises"
- In reply to: stew dean: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Next in thread: Richard Forrest: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: Richard Forrest: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: stew dean: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|