Re: Maxwell, Einstein and displacement current

From: Bill Hobba (bhobba_at_rubbish.net.au)
Date: 09/14/04 

Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:01:54 GMT

"jahn" <suzysewnshow@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:2qoav6F11iko5U1@uni-berlin.de...
>
> Exerpt:
> The first problematical point arises if we want to distinguish "physical
> space" from the space-time diagrams of which classical mechanics makes
use.

How about more actual experimentally verifiable predictions and less
semantic quibbling - 'physical space', 'really real', 'objective reality',
'effects effecting' and all the other junk this ilk delusionally think is
science.

> Admitted that the relations indicated by Einstein represent Faraday's
> electromagnetic induction and Maxwell's displacement current in Amp`ere's
> equation respectively, the invariance of Maxwell's equation system
involves
> mechanical transformation properties of the fields at small velocities.

Mechanical transformation properties?

> These transformation properties are by no means shared by "physical
space".

Very easy to say things like that with impunity when you are vague about
"physical space" is.

> Again, the uniformity and isotropy prescribed for temperature radiation in
> the oven cavity do not coincide with a superposition of stationary waves
in
> space-time.

Even assuming the above makes sense (and I can not make sense of it) your
point being?

Rest of junk along the same lines mercifully snipped.

Bill