Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
From: George Hammond (nowhere_at_nomailspam.com)
Date: 09/14/04
- Next message: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Previous message: Eric Baird: "Re: definition of a clock in relativity theory"
- In reply to: stew dean: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Next in thread: stew dean: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: stew dean: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: stew dean: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: David Iain Greig: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: bv_schornak: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 23:02:29 +0000 (UTC)
"stew dean" <stewart@webslave.dircon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:2b68957a.0409140819.57f0be77@posting.google.com...
> "George Hammond" <nowhere@nomailspam.com> wrote in message
news:<86CdnUYZx7L0ItvcRVn-hw@comcast.com>...
> > "stew dean" <stewart@webslave.dircon.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:2b68957a.0409132352.74c7a10d@posting.google.com...
> > > "George Hammond" <nowhere@nomailspam.com> wrote in message
> > news:<GsedneBgjYGGzNvcRVn-gw@comcast.com>...
> > > > "stew dean" <stewart@webslave.dircon.co.uk> wrote in message
> > > > news:2b68957a.0409131451.dea5cc3@posting.google.com...
> > > > > "George Hammond" <nowhere@nomailspam.com> wrote in message
> > news:<B82dnSm4IuvbwtjcRVn-pg@comcast.com>...
> > > > > > "stew dean" <stewart@webslave.dircon.co.uk> wrote in
> > > > > > message news:2b68957a.0409122328.4910c506@posting.google.com...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [Stew Dean]
> > > > > > ....simply that there is no relationship between the arbitary N
> > > > > > dimentional space of the personality profiling and the non
> > > > > > arbitary N dimentional space of the universe.
> > > > > > Stew Dean
> >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [Hammond]
> > > > >
> > > >
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > -
> > > > > > How real space (X-Y-Z) causes Psychometry space (E-N-P)
> > > > >
> > > >
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > -
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [Hammond]
> > > > > > Hey... I've answered this many times before.
> > > > > > Let me outline it step by step:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. It is an experimental fact that real space has a
> > > > > > quadratic metric. This is why we say
> > > > > > "real space is Euclidean". "Euclidean" MEANS
> > > > > > "having a quadratic metric" e.g.:
> > > > > > dR^2 = dX^2 + dY^2 + dZ^2
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2. This means that real space is a space of
> > > > > > "rigid body rotations". With any other metric
> > > > > > you could not rotate a rigid body in space without
> > > > > > rupturing it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 3. It is known that there exist only 3 "simple"
> > > > > > coordinate systems in Euclidean space:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A. Cartesian
> > > > > > B. Polar/Cylindrical
> > > > > > C. Spherical
> > > > >
> > > > > Coordinate systems are man made it should be worth noting.
> > > >
> > > > [Hammond]
> > > > No they are not. The fact that there are "only 3 simple coordinate
> > > > systems, Cartesian, Polar, Spherical" in real space, is a
> > > > PHYSICAL FACT, not a matter of
> > > > ARBITRARY CONVENTION.
> > > > You do greatly err.
> > >
> > > No you are the one who made the mistake. Time and space has
> > > dimensions, probably around 11 or so according to the latest work.
> > > Time and space does not have a coordinate system, that is something we
> > > made up. For example the earth has a coordinate system but there is
> > > equator is no a physical line.
> >
> > [Hammond]
> > No dimensions beyond 4 are of any interest whatsoever to
> > any "classical physics theory", and the SPoG is a
> > "classical physicis theory", end of that argument.
>
> But it isnt. It's attempting to apply a 'classical physics theory' to
> something that is not physics. Namely an arbitary data set.
[Hammond]
STOP POSTING YOUR ERRONEOUS TAUTOLOTY.
the "eigenvectors" of ALL PSYCHOLOGY CORRELATION
MATRICES return E,N,P irregardles of the matrices' origin..
questionnarie, physiology data, assessment etc.
Therefore these "eigenvectors" represnt REAL PHYSICAL
INVARIENT QUANTITIES.... in fact they turn out to
be the 3-SYMMERTRY AXES OF THE BRAIN.
>
>
>
> > > You have confused the territory with the map.
> >
> > [Hammond]
> > No... you don't know what you are talking about.
>
> In this case, and within the boundaries of this argument, I do.
[Hammond]
No you don't
>
>
> > The METRICAL properties of Euclidean space
> > IS WHAT DETERMINES the FACT that only 3
> > "simple" coordinate systems exist in Euclidean
> > space: Cartesian, Polar/Cylindrical and Spherical.
>
> Urm yes, and there are other less simple systems. I could invent a
> system tommorrow if I wanted. I doubt anyone would use it.
[Hammond]
No you couldn't. It is proven by thousands of
years of mathematics that Cartesian-polar/cylindrical
and Spherical ARE THE ONLY SIMPLE
COORDINATE SYSTEMS IN EUCLIDEAN SPACE.
> > The "Euclidean (quadratic) metric" is the ONLY
> > metric known to man that produces a space where
> > "rigid body rotations" are possible. No other metric
> > will, and this is why the "Cartesian, Polar/Cylindrical,
> > and Spherical" coordinates are the "3 simple coordinate
> > systems" of REAL SPACE.
>
> This is all nice. What has it got to do with anything?
[Hammond]
REAL SPACE "must therefore" be "Euclidiean"
(Riemannian for pedants)... it MUST have a
"quadratic metric" otherwise you couldn't
rotate a solid object in real space... you couldn't
even turn your head!
>
> > This fact is actually PHYSICALLY MANIFESTED
> > in the "simple" shapes of common physical objects.
>
> This is where you don't get it. Physical objects exist in the
> dimensions of space. The Cartesian way of measuring things. X, Y and Z
> is the way we explain where things are in space as there are three
> main dimensions, plus we have the arrow of time.
>
> The Cartesian system is derived from nature, but it is not nature.
[Hammond]
In a Euclidean space the "simplest" coordinate
system to "mechanically construct" is a
Cartesian coordinate system... i.e. 3 straight
orthogonal lines.
>
> I think that's about as simple as I can explain it to you. The
> Cartesian system is the map, it is not the actual land.
[Hammond]
the Cartesian Map is the simplest, because the
land is actually cartesian.... i.e. has a quadratic
metric, i.e. the "distance" in Euclidean space is
sqrt (x^2 + y^2). Two unit lines set at right
angles has this distance between their ends.
>
> > In particular this FACT explains why all animals and plants
> > have a "Cartesian Body Plan".
>
> But it's not a fact. All animals and plants exit in three dimensions,
> but then everything does. There are systems for explaining how animals
> and plants form but then I appear to be more aware of these than you.
> A tree, for example, can be expressed using a simple mathematical
> equation. Working in the four dimentions and using a simple
> itterative equation L-systems can build suprisingly life like mimics
> of natural objects like ferns.
[Hammond]
All plants are basically "Cartesian". the Stem is the
z-axis. The first two leaves (branches) sprout along
the x-axis, the next two sprout along the y-axis,
the next two aalong the x-axis agin, the next two
along the y-axis again. this is the fundamental body
plan of all PLANTS. Look at a plant sprout when it
frist comes out of the gorund and you will notice it,
or look at:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/SEED.jpg
yes... click on thre goddamned URL and look at it!
>
> > I.e. It is BECAUSE of the mertical structure of real space.
>
> So it all come down to a truism of 'space has four dimentions, three
> of which are X, Y and Z'. The brain is not a square, it's a complex
> shape that grows itteratively in three dimensions.
[Hammond]
It's "complex" to YOU, because you're stupid.
It's simple to me because I'm smart.
>
> > From this, it is a direct chain of causality from "spacetime"
> > to "psychometric space",
>
> No it's not. That's the point.
[Hammond]
Yes it is.... the "point" is that you are not a scientist and
have no science education.
>
> I've explained that some versions of 'pshychometric space' are 3D
> because that's a handy way to express a diagram. It can be and is
> often expressed in more dimensions.
>
> There is no link. I know you're trying to explain how there is but it
> appears you havnt thought it through.
>
> > and hence from Gravity
> > to God, via Einstein's curvature theory of Gravity.
>
> No George, there is no link between the arbitary diagramming techique
> of someone measuring personality results and the 4 and more
> dimensions of space time other than the one I've said, it's just easy
> to show a diagram in 3D rather than 7D.
[Hammond]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The "eigenvectors" of Psychometry are CAUSED BY
the symmetry axes of the brain.
Please write that on the blackboard 25 times
until you understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The "eigenvectors" of Psychometry are CAUSED BY
the symmetry axes of the brain.
Please write that on the blackboard 25 times
until you understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The "eigenvectors" of Psychometry are CAUSED BY
the symmetry axes of the brain.
Please write that on the blackboard 25 times
until you understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The "eigenvectors" of Psychometry are CAUSED BY
the symmetry axes of the brain.
Please write that on the blackboard 25 times
until you understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The "eigenvectors" of Psychometry are CAUSED BY
the symmetry axes of the brain.
Please write that on the blackboard 25 times
until you understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The "eigenvectors" of Psychometry are CAUSED BY
the symmetry axes of the brain.
Please write that on the blackboard 25 times
until you understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The "eigenvectors" of Psychometry are CAUSED BY
the symmetry axes of the brain.
Please write that on the blackboard 25 times
until you understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The "eigenvectors" of Psychometry are CAUSED BY
the symmetry axes of the brain.
Please write that on the blackboard 25 times
until you understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The "eigenvectors" of Psychometry are CAUSED BY
the symmetry axes of the brain.
Please write that on the blackboard 25 times
until you understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The "eigenvectors" of Psychometry are CAUSED BY
the symmetry axes of the brain.
Please write that on the blackboard 25 times
until you understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The "eigenvectors" of Psychometry are CAUSED BY
the symmetry axes of the brain.
Please write that on the blackboard 25 times
until you understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The "eigenvectors" of Psychometry are CAUSED BY
the symmetry axes of the brain.
Please write that on the blackboard 25 times
until you understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The "eigenvectors" of Psychometry are CAUSED BY
the symmetry axes of the brain.
Please write that on the blackboard 25 times
until you understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The "eigenvectors" of Psychometry are CAUSED BY
the symmetry axes of the brain.
Please write that on the blackboard 25 times
until you understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The "eigenvectors" of Psychometry are CAUSED BY
the symmetry axes of the brain.
Please write that on the blackboard 25 times
until you understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The "eigenvectors" of Psychometry are CAUSED BY
the symmetry axes of the brain.
Please write that on the blackboard 25 times
until you understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The "eigenvectors" of Psychometry are CAUSED BY
the symmetry axes of the brain.
Please write that on the blackboard 25 times
until you understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The "eigenvectors" of Psychometry are CAUSED BY
the symmetry axes of the brain.
Please write that on the blackboard 25 times
until you understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The "eigenvectors" of Psychometry are CAUSED BY
the symmetry axes of the brain.
Please write that on the blackboard 25 times
until you understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The "eigenvectors" of Psychometry are CAUSED BY
the symmetry axes of the brain.
Please write that on the blackboard 25 times
until you understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The "eigenvectors" of Psychometry are CAUSED BY
the symmetry axes of the brain.
Please write that on the blackboard 25 times
until you understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The "eigenvectors" of Psychometry are CAUSED BY
the symmetry axes of the brain.
Please write that on the blackboard 25 times
until you understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The "eigenvectors" of Psychometry are CAUSED BY
the symmetry axes of the brain.
Please write that on the blackboard 25 times
until you understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The "eigenvectors" of Psychometry are CAUSED BY
the symmetry axes of the brain.
Please write that on the blackboard 25 times
until you understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Stew Dean
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
1st mirror site:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
2nd mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
new site (under construction):
http://home.comcast.net/~proof-of-god
====================================
- Next message: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Previous message: Eric Baird: "Re: definition of a clock in relativity theory"
- In reply to: stew dean: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Next in thread: stew dean: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: stew dean: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: stew dean: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: David Iain Greig: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: bv_schornak: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|