Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
From: TMG (TMG_at_Nowhere.org)
Date: 09/15/04
- Next message: Robert B. Winn: "Re: velocity of light."
- Previous message: Robert B. Winn: "Re: velocity of light."
- In reply to: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 03:10:04 +0000 (UTC)
George Hammond wrote:
> "bv_schornak" <nowhere@schornak.de> wrote in
> message news:ci7hrl$7or$02$1@news.t-online.com...
>
>
>
>>No, George. As others already told you, ...<snip>
>
>
>
> [Hammond]
> Before you start telling me about Physics, why
> don't you correct an elementary MISTAKE
> in your website:
>
> [Hammond]
> By the way
> let me point out an error in
> your website. You say:
>
> [Quote from Bernies website at: http://schornak.de/aspog/0000.htm ]
>
> "Opposite to his statement, both graphs in Hammond's diagram
> (see http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/index_files/img2.gif )
> start at zero with no visible difference at the zero point. Both graphs
> diverge from each other with growing distance from the zero point.
> Reading Hammond's diagram, the "brain growth deficit" (BGD)
> - whatever that is - definitely increases with growing age."
>
> [Hammond]
> This statement is WRONG.
> The BGD is the difference between 100% and the value of the
> curve (either curve) at any point.
> Thus for the "genotypic curve" the BGD starts at 100%
> at birth, and slowly goes to 0 at adulthood.
I thought your point was the delta between the two curves - which is BGD
(as you defined it). What does an absolute (100%) value within *a* graph
prove??
> For the "Phenotypic curve" the BGD starts at 100%
> at birth, but only decreases to about 15% at adulthood.
>
> You have TOTALLY MISUNDERSTOOD what the BGD
> is, and your statement above is WRONG.
No - he followed your definition. It may be wrong (actually
meaningless), but it's *your* definition.
> Likewise, just about everything else in your A-SPoG
> website is wrong too.
Kind of short on the details here. Point by point counter-references please.
>>Greetings from Augsburg
>>
>>Bernhard Schornak
>>
- Next message: Robert B. Winn: "Re: velocity of light."
- Previous message: Robert B. Winn: "Re: velocity of light."
- In reply to: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
