Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science
From: Androcles (androc1es_at_nospamblueyonder.co.uk)
Date: 09/15/04
- Next message: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv Proof of 'Intelligent Design'"
- Previous message: Robert B. Winn: "Re: velocity of light."
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science"
- Next in thread: Darrin Edwards: "Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science"
- Reply: Darrin Edwards: "Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 03:31:58 GMT
"robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:2qpol6F12eltqU2@uni-berlin.de...
|
|
| Androcles wrote:
|
| > Yeah, well, let's see someone do that with time.
|
| The basic laws of physics do not care whether the time parameter is
| positive or negaive. If you run the world backward (like rewinding a
| tape) the laws operative at the smallest scales still work. It is
| aggregates that show a directionality of time, not the basic laws.
|
| Bob Kolker
Yeah, well, let's see someone do that with time.
Androcles
- Next message: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv Proof of 'Intelligent Design'"
- Previous message: Robert B. Winn: "Re: velocity of light."
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science"
- Next in thread: Darrin Edwards: "Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science"
- Reply: Darrin Edwards: "Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
