Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
From: George Hammond (nowhere_at_nomailspam.com)
Date: 09/15/04
- Next message: TMG: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Previous message: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- In reply to: TMG: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Next in thread: TMG: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: TMG: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: bv_schornak: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 04:14:36 +0000 (UTC)
"TMG" <TMG@Nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:UeidnS9Ujut_L9rcRVn-uA@comcast.com...
> George Hammond wrote:
>
> > "bv_schornak" <nowhere@schornak.de> wrote in
> > message news:ci7hrl$7or$02$1@news.t-online.com...
> >
> >
> >
> >>No, George. As others already told you, ...<snip>
> >
> >
> >
> > [Hammond]
> > Before you start telling me about Physics, why
> > don't you correct an elementary MISTAKE
> > in your website:
> >
> > [Hammond]
> > By the way
> > let me point out an error in
> > your website. You say:
> >
> > [Quote from Bernies website at: http://schornak.de/aspog/0000.htm ]
> >
> > "Opposite to his statement, both graphs in Hammond's diagram
> > (see http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/index_files/img2.gif )
> > start at zero with no visible difference at the zero point. Both graphs
> > diverge from each other with growing distance from the zero point.
> > Reading Hammond's diagram, the "brain growth deficit" (BGD)
> > - whatever that is - definitely increases with growing age."
> >
> > [Hammond]
> > This statement is WRONG.
> > The BGD is the difference between 100% and the value of the
> > curve (either curve) at any point.
> > Thus for the "genotypic curve" the BGD starts at 100%
> > at birth, and slowly goes to 0 at adulthood.
>
>
> I thought your point was the delta between the two curves - which is BGD
> (as you defined it). What does an absolute (100%) value within *a* graph
> prove??
>
> > For the "Phenotypic curve" the BGD starts at 100%
> > at birth, but only decreases to about 15% at adulthood.
> >
> > You have TOTALLY MISUNDERSTOOD what the BGD
> > is, and your statement above is WRONG.
>
>
> No - he followed your definition. It may be wrong (actually
> meaningless), but it's *your* definition.
[Hammond]
LIAR
>
> > Likewise, just about everything else in your A-SPoG
> > website is wrong too.
>
> Kind of short on the details here. Point by point counter-references
please.
[Hammond]
Absolutely no friggin problem:
Time to wake up Bernie. The BGD *IS* the "difference
between the two curves for ADULTS".
It is NOT the difference between the two curves for
CHILDREN. Here, I've drawn a special picture for
you to clear up your error:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/img222.gif
NOTICE that the "BGD" clearly DECREASES as one
grows up for the first 18 years of life, THEN it remains
CONSTANT (15%) for the rest of your life.
<snip Shornak's amateur complaints about being cought
in another mistake>
> Greetings from Augsburg
>
> Bernhard Schornak
>
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
1st mirror site:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
2nd mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
new site (under construction):
http://home.comcast.net/~proof-of-god
====================================
- Next message: TMG: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Previous message: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- In reply to: TMG: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Next in thread: TMG: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: TMG: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: bv_schornak: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
