Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation

From: stew dean (stewart_at_webslave.dircon.co.uk)
Date: 09/15/04 

Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 06:58:07 +0000 (UTC)

"George Hammond" <nowhere@nomailspam.com> wrote in message news:<8ZidnV_xpKOA59rcRVn-tA@comcast.com>...
> "bv_schornak" <nowhere@schornak.de> wrote in
> message news:ci7hrl$7or$02$1@news.t-online.com...
>
>
> > No, George. As others already told you, ...<snip>
>
>
> [Hammond]
> Before you start telling me about Physics, why
> don't you correct an elementary MISTAKE
> in your website:

Actualy this is not related to physics but really simple logic.
Pleased don't avoid this point as it appears I also picked up on it.
Here's what you snipped.

"No, George. As others already told you, reality does not
follow the rules of humans - it is the other way around.
Neither Earth nor a house, coffee table and bowling ball
cares about your metrics. These things exist, regardless
if someone uses any metrics to calculate them or not."

So there you go. If you have a set of scales and find out the fish
you are weighing are always roughly a kilo in weight the scales do not
cause the fish to be that weight, nature does.

We get our metrics from nature, these metrics give us coordinate sets
which are usable (or 'simple' in your terms). Same is true with the
personality testing, in one set of personality testing someone devised
a three dimensional scale, because it's usable. Others have 200
dimensional and 2 dimensional.

Objectively the result is therefore personality testing can have an
arbitary amount of dimensions to hold it's data (or dataset as I have
used before).

The data is objective but it's definition is arbitary so therefore
does not reproduce the original it is measuring but gives an
abstraction of it. Pick a different way of measuring personality and
you get a different set of figures.

What you are doing is reading up on a subject and not understanding
it's implications but grabbing parts of it and sticking it with parts
of something else. You may have data to support the existence of the
parts but not the new frankenstien like hypothesis you're trying to
make. There's no point having this knowledge if you havnt understood
it.

Now to get onto why you have your 'theory'.

It's very clear from your posts you are suffering from an accute form
of compulsive personality disorder. You have overall urge to be in
control and the need to have superior knowledge. Look it up on the
internet and see what others say, you should find aspects that, if
you're honest with yourself, you recognise.

What has made you this way I don't know but it's worth noting that
everyone needs help in their life at some point, that's how people
succeed in life, not through rejecting the help of others.

Stew Dean