Re: Lorentz Ether Theory and FTL Paradoxes
From: ueb (Ulrich.Bruchholz_at_t-online.de)
Date: 09/15/04
- Next message: ueb: "Re: The symmetry of the metric tensor"
- Previous message: bv_schornak: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- In reply to: Ilja Schmelzer: "Re: Lorentz Ether Theory and FTL Paradoxes"
- Next in thread: Ilja Schmelzer: "Re: Lorentz Ether Theory and FTL Paradoxes"
- Reply: Ilja Schmelzer: "Re: Lorentz Ether Theory and FTL Paradoxes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 19:51:11 +0000
Ilja Schmelzer wrote:
> "ueb" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:t0eqhc.46.ln@Muse2.private.de...
>> Ilja Schmelzer wrote:
>>
>> > "xxein" schrieb
>> >> xxein: I am not disagreeing in toto, but what is gravity? Regardless
>> >> of SR-LET, ....
>> >>
>> >> What is your 'physical grip' on gravity?
>>
>> > Gravity is a field with 10 components. According to my generalization
> of
>> > LET to gravity these 10 components are:
>>
>> > 1. Ether density rho (1 component)
>> > 2. Ether velocity v^i (3 components)
>> > 3. Ether stress tensor (symmetric 3x3 tensor, 6 components)
>>
>> > Ilja
>>
>> Your phantasy is admirable.
>> Anything that has a density, a velocity, and a "stress" must be
>> a medium. Is there any evidence for the existence of such medium ?
> Yep. The fact that the fields we observe fit in such a nice and simple
> way into the scheme of fields which are appropriate for condensed
> matter theory.
Nice. Do I rightly understand you stating that your theory is proved
by another theory ? - I must admit that I have still to learn this
new kind of evidence. :-)
Ulrich
- Next message: ueb: "Re: The symmetry of the metric tensor"
- Previous message: bv_schornak: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- In reply to: Ilja Schmelzer: "Re: Lorentz Ether Theory and FTL Paradoxes"
- Next in thread: Ilja Schmelzer: "Re: Lorentz Ether Theory and FTL Paradoxes"
- Reply: Ilja Schmelzer: "Re: Lorentz Ether Theory and FTL Paradoxes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|