Re: For Henri Wilson.

From: Paul B. Andersen (paul.b.andersen_at_hia.no)
Date: 09/15/04 

Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 22:12:52 +0200

"Henri Wilson" <H@..> skrev i melding news:qe7fk0d9t1kvhqla2l0qflg9k2mbtksj0h@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 23:17:37 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@hia.no>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Henri Wilson" <H@..> skrev i melding news:6s8ck05ijicnrhh3mi2q7hqkvcbviujlrv@4ax.com...
> >> On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 23:28:25 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@hia.no>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >You have lost, Henri.
> >> >And you know it.
> >> >
> >> >Paul, having a great time
> >>
> >> ..yes! Avoiding: sin(t/T) + sin(t/T+pi) = 0
> >
> >Claiming that 2 flashes + 2 flashes = 0 flashes again, Henry?
> >
> >2 + 2 = 4
> >Pin it up above your computer.
> >
> >Paul
> >
>
> Paul I have now given you about five good reasons why you wont see the flashes
> that YOUR version of the ballistic theory expects.

You are referring to these flashes, right?

Paul B. Andersen wrote in June 2004:
| I think we now can sum up what the ballistic theory
| predicts HD80715 should look like.
| From:
| http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/9912/9912158.pdf
| You can see from the spectrum that the H_alpha line split ca. 2.5A,
| which is a relative split of 3.8*10^-4.
| This means that the amplitude of each component is ca. 1.9*10^-4.
| The amplitude of the radial (from observer) component of
| the orbital speed will thus be v/c = 1.9*10^-4, or v = 57 km/s.
| The period is 3.8 days.
| From:
| http://astro.estec.esa.nl/hipparcos_scripts/HIPcatalogueSearch.pl
| we find that the distance is 24 parsecs.
|
| These number will give the ratio (2*pi*d*v/c^2)/p
| the value 9.
| So we will during one period see five stars all the time,
| and two additional stars part of the time. These two last
| stars will either merge in a brilliant flash, or suddenly
| appear in a brilliant flash and then split.
| These flashes will be brighter than 1 for 0.036 period,
| brighter than 10 for 0.0004 period,
| brighter than 100 for 0.000004 period.
| By adding the brightness of the stars, we will get
| the following light curve:
|
| "phase" is normalized, one period = 1.
| "brightness" is relative to the brightness of a stationary star
| N is number of stars seen.
|
| phase brightness N
|
| 0.0 1.22 7
| 0.1 1.21 7
| 0.17 1.97 7
| 0.18 2.45 7
| 0.19 5.90 7
| 0.1913 60.00 7
| 0.191310 infinite 7->5
| 0.2 0.66 5
| 0.3 0.64 5
| 0.4 0.63 5
| 0.5 0.62 5
| 0.6 0.63 5
| 0.7 0.64 5
| 0.8 0.67 5
| 0.808719 infinite 5->7
| 0.8089 21.6 7
| 0.809 11.80 7
| 0.81 3.90 7
| 0.9 1.34 7
| 1.0 1.22 7
|
| Note that the integral over one period is 1,
| that is the average brightness is 1.
|
| The above is for one of the stars, you can get
| the light curve for both stars by translating
| the above half a period and adding.

Henri Wilson responded:
| I can get these figures from my program.
|
| Surprisingly, they agree exactly with yours..... proves my program is
| correct.... not that I ever doubted it.
|
| So I could have saved you all that time and trouble.
| Just click your mouse a
| few times and...there is your curve.

... which MY version of the ballistic theory predicts, eh? :-)

And one of the reasons why we don't see the flashes
predicted by the ballistic theory is: sin(t/T) + sin(t/T+pi) = 0?

> You are so brainwashed you have lost your powers of reason.

Since the reason in your remark:
"Avoiding: sin(t/T) + sin(t/T+pi) = 0"
escapes me, I suppose I must be brainwashed.
But I am confident that you will explain the reason
in your remark:.Won't you?

Paul, still having a good time

Relevant Pages

  • Re: For Henri Wilson.
    ... >>| and two additional stars part of the time. ... >>| By adding the brightness of the stars, ... >>And one of the reasons why we don't see the flashes ... > nothing to do with the absence of flashes but to an entirely different question ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: M1
    ... I see only the brightest stars with my naked eye. ... The filter helped us find them. ... over the years the Crab still can be seen ... just a fraction of the brightness, barely above the glow you get from ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Searching for M104
    ... The first is what level of background surface brightness I am dealing ... All stars forming the "Little Dipper" were visible to the unaided eye, ... stars would likely be visible with your telescope). ... magnification until you get your own 'best' view. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson
    ... > stars of various forms. ... his program to find the light curve of this particular ... Basically, the newton brightness rises ... > the assumed orbital velocity it moves around. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The DHR Cloned Drone Hierarchical Structure.
    ... >>the ballistic theory are false, ... > The two stars are 180 out of phase and their brightness variations almost ... Henri Wilson responded: ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)