Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
From: Timberwoof (timberwoof_at_stimpberawoofm.com)
Date: 09/19/04
- Next message: Eugene Stefanovich: "Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity."
- Previous message: Timberwoof: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- In reply to: bv_schornak: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Next in thread: bv_schornak: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: bv_schornak: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:42:38 +0000 (UTC)
In article <ciks3p$e9n$01$1@news.t-online.com>,
bv_schornak <nowhere@schornak.de> wrote:
> Timberwoof wrote:
>
> >bv_schornak wrote:
> >
> >>George Hammond wrote:
> >>
> >>>stew dean wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>The point is the brain is a 3-axis mirror symmetirc construct
> >>>>>which begins at the 8 cell stage in embryology (1st 3 cleavages).
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>Let's review that again - the brain is roughly symmetrical along one
> >>>>axis, as is the rest of the body. You have DNA to thank for this.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>[Hammond]
> >>>Really? I'm ponly claiming the Left-right symmetry of the
> >>>body comes from the first cleavage of the Egg (a fact proved
> >>>by Roux, Conklin and others). You just stated that it comes
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>from DNA.... what makes you think that?
> >>
> >>
> >>You've already forgotten that we get two complete (but half
> >>sized) organisms, if we separate both cells after the first
> >>cleavage? And four quarter sized organisms after the second
> >>cleavage? George, George...
> >>
> >>Where else than in the DNA should the information about the
> >>final organism sit?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Mitochondrial DNA, chemical environment during gestation, and the whole
> >environment as the being grows up.
> >
>
> Isn't the Mitrochondrial DNA just a "copy" of the original
> double helix?
Nope. It is DNA that is separate from the nuclear DNA. It is believe that these
two sources of DNA stem from two separate lines of single-celled species which
merged to form a new type of life. The same thing is believed to hae happened in
plants: chloroplasts are analogous to mitochondria.
> Dunno, but I think it is valid for the cells
> after the 1st cleavage. [Hammond] claims that the symmetry
> of the organism is determined by those two cells, which is
> not true - <http://www.devbio.com/article.php?ch=3&id=15>.
> The article says that until the _third_ cleavage the cells
> are able to grow to a fully developed organism with 1/2 or
> 1/4 of the normal size, if we separate the cells from each
> other.
Hmmm. Identical twins form this way. But I do not think they are born
half-szied.
-- Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com Otto: "Haha! Apes do not read philosophy!" Wanda: "Yes, they do. They just don't understand it."
- Next message: Eugene Stefanovich: "Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity."
- Previous message: Timberwoof: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- In reply to: bv_schornak: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Next in thread: bv_schornak: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: bv_schornak: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|