Re: definition of a clock in relativity theory
ande452_at_attglobal.net
Date: 09/20/04
- Next message: Timberwoof: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Previous message: Eugene Shubert: "Re: Is a Crystal-clear Theory Preferable to Dogmatic Riddles?"
- In reply to: Henri Wilson: "Re: definition of a clock in relativity theory"
- Next in thread: Gauge: "Re: definition of a clock in relativity theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:33:13 -0700
Henri Wilson wrote:
>
> On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 22:56:40 -0700, ande452@attglobal.net wrote:
>
> >Androcles wrote:
> >>
> >> "Henri Wilson" <H@..> wrote in message
> >> news:4u2kk0pmfbvpem0d0lvi5810tff5itf3hv@4ax.com...
> >>
> >> | Which, when translated, means "light has mass like anything else... but by
> >> god,
> >> | we DHRs will never admit to the fact"!
> >>
> >> Mass is E/c^2.
> >> Light has E/c^2 like anything else?
> >> That's a little circular, isn't it?
> >
> >You're quoting something that has been discredited
> >for years.
> >
> > E = M*c^2 where M is the "relativistic mass"
> >
> >Anyone with ANY knowledge of relativity knows that
> >
> > E = sqrt((p*c)^2 + (m*c^2)^2)
> >
> >where m is the invariant mass.
>
> Anybody with any knowledge of Islam knows that
>
> 1 large car bomb=sitting next to Allah in heaven with a girl on each arm.
Knocking Muslims doesn't address my point. Relativistic mass is
an anachronism.
>
> >
> >E = p*c for a photon. What does that make m?
> >
> >Why would you use M, since it is equivalent to E?
> >
> >John Anderson
>
Answer my last question.
John Anderson
- Next message: Timberwoof: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Previous message: Eugene Shubert: "Re: Is a Crystal-clear Theory Preferable to Dogmatic Riddles?"
- In reply to: Henri Wilson: "Re: definition of a clock in relativity theory"
- Next in thread: Gauge: "Re: definition of a clock in relativity theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
