Re: Is the speed of light really constant ?
From: Bill Hobba (bhobba_at_rubbish.net.au)
Date: 09/20/04
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Russia gets it. Democrats don't."
- Previous message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Cosmic expansion means > c ?"
- In reply to: Mich: "Re: Is the speed of light really constant ?"
- Next in thread: Mich: "Re: Is the speed of light really constant ?"
- Reply: Mich: "Re: Is the speed of light really constant ?"
- Reply: Mich: "Re: Is the speed of light really constant ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:46:43 GMT
"Mich" <mich@efni.com> wrote in message
news:10ktip75pirppf4@corp.supernews.com...
>
> Bruce Richmond <bsr3997@my-deja.com> wrote in message
> news:747a5d11.0409191853.2f30c46f@posting.google.com...
> > "Mich" <mich@efni.com> wrote in message
> news:<10kqvt6hjnr0j70@corp.supernews.com>...
> > > joseph levy <josephlevy1@compuserve.com> wrote in message
> > > news:cii0t6$o1p$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com...
>
> > When changing frames of reference you are also changing coordinate
> > systems. Each coordinate system is constructed based on the speed of
> > light being c in that frame. The change in frequency tells you that
> > there has been a change in relative motion, but it tells you nothing
> > about the speed of the light.
>
> Could you elaborate on how the change in coordinate systems will affect
> the
> frequency of light?
See http://courses.washington.edu/p116as02/part2dopplershift.html.
Bill
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Russia gets it. Democrats don't."
- Previous message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Cosmic expansion means > c ?"
- In reply to: Mich: "Re: Is the speed of light really constant ?"
- Next in thread: Mich: "Re: Is the speed of light really constant ?"
- Reply: Mich: "Re: Is the speed of light really constant ?"
- Reply: Mich: "Re: Is the speed of light really constant ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|