Re: Question about God=G_uv

From: bv_schornak (nowhere_at_schornak.de)
Date: 09/26/04 

Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:40:43 +0100

George Hammond wrote:

>jim fish wrote:
>
>>>There is <http://schornak.de/aspog/index.htm>. ;)
>>>
>>>None of [Hammond]'s arguments was shown to be true until
>>>now...
>>>
>>Than you Bernard. After reading some of his stuff and fighting the urge to
>>reply I in detail, I certainly appreciate the time, effort, and satire of
>>your response :-)
>>
>
>[Hammond]
>Bernie's anti-SPoG website is a joke. There isn't a whit of serious
>or competent science in it.
>

George - could it be that you're a little bit jealeous because
Anti-SPoG gets better cutups than SPoG?

BTW - Anti-SPoG does offer competent science. If you remember,
it rebuts SPoG's false, pseudo-scientific babble. Perhaps your
abilities to suppress the truth aren't as good as you thought?

Greetings from Augsburg

Bernhard Schornak

P.S.: Delete alt.taoism.philosophy from the header. They have
some trolls defending "their domain". It's a waste of time to
battle them (except you do it for fun).

Relevant Pages

  • Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
    ... >TMG wouldn't dare put up an anti-spog site. ... >He knows the spog is legitimate and that I'm a persecuted ... cause it was George Hammond who made that statement. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
    ... George Hammond wrote: ... > TMG wouldn't dare put up an anti-spog site. ... I missed the part in spog that has anything to do with my job. ... A big bowl of tripe. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Question about God=G_uv
    ... George Hammond wrote: ... Where are your SPoG fans? ... First there was Anti-SPoG... ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
    ... George Hammond wrote: ... > No competent science person has ever ... Assimilate a pitiful little species like you? ... - Q of Borg ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast