Re: Question about God=G_uv

From: bv_schornak (nowhere_at_schornak.de)
Date: 09/27/04 

Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 07:19:10 +0000 (UTC)

George Hammond wrote:

>bv_schornak wrote:
>
>>George Hammond wrote:
>>
>>>jim fish wrote:
>>>
>>>>>There is <http://schornak.de/aspog/index.htm>. ;)
>>>>>
>>>>>None of [Hammond]'s arguments was shown to be true until
>>>>>now...
>>>>>
>>>>Than you Bernard. After reading some of his stuff and fighting the urge
>>>>
>to
>
>>>>reply I in detail, I certainly appreciate the time, effort, and satire
>>>>
>of
>
>>>>your response :-)
>>>>
>>>[Hammond]
>>>Bernie's anti-SPoG website is a joke. There isn't a whit of serious
>>>or competent science in it.
>>>
>>George - could it be that you're a little bit jealeous because
>>Anti-SPoG gets better cutups than SPoG?
>>
>
>[Hammond]
>Hitler would get better cutups than me in a federal
>prison, what does that prove?
>

Maybe that Tito was a worse truck driver than me?

Hey, George - 25 years ago, I published a bunch of fanzines.
Today, there are exhibitions and they read these fanzines to
a lot of people. What about SPoG - anyone who ever has shown
your stuff in exhibitions?

>>BTW - Anti-SPoG does offer competent science. If you remember,
>>it rebuts SPoG's false, pseudo-scientific babble. Perhaps your
>>abilities to suppress the truth aren't as good as you thought?
>>
>
>[Hammond]
>Na.... its the other way around..... YOU'RE efforts to suppress the
>truth are pathetic. You're scientific expertixe wouldn't last 2 seconds
>in a competent scientific forum. remember.... this IS NOT A
>COMPETENT SCIENTIFIC FORUM..... this is a "pissing contest
>forum".... and so far you can't even outpiss me.
>

See - first you have to _prove_ where I am wrong. Then - you
know I would do it - I _would_ admit that I failed with that
specific topic.

You haven't proven _anything_ until now, remember?

BTW - you are free to publish an Anti-"Anti-SPoG"... ;)

Greetings from Augsburg

Bernhard Schornak

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Question about God=G_uv
    ... George Hammond wrote: ... there are exhibitions and they read these fanzines to ... you think amateur kooks are the only ones following ... Eventually that discovery led to the discovery ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQs OVER 150
    ... > George Hammond wrote: ... >> flattery will get you nowhere ... > And the truth comes out. ... intelligence than college degrees! ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
    ... George Hammond wrote: ... "truth" very convincing. ... And replace them with more stupid errors? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)