Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
From: dandelion (somewhere_at_meadown.net)
Date: 09/27/04
- Next message: Randy Poe: "Re: The outcome of Einstein's year"
- Previous message: Tom Roberts: "Re: Derivation of Lorentz from basic assumptions"
- In reply to: Minh511_at_ninhthuanpt.com.vn: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:29:05 +0000 (UTC)
> According to SR:
> 1. Anything travelling at c would have infinite mass, except the
> light! Why?
Co'z light has no mass. and Zero times N is Zero even for big values of
zero.
> 2. Every relative motions must obey the law a+b>a, a-b<a, except the
> speed of light c! Why?.. Why is this excepting only in a vacuum but
> not in the medium?
<scratching behind ears>
It would be news to me if this would not be the case.
</scratching behind ears>
> 3. The speed of any motions must be defined by the law dx/dt, except
> the speed of light! Why?..
Coz' 'The speed of light' is defined exactly like that. It would (again) be
news to me if it weren't.
> This also means the speed of light was
> defined in a condition independing on the space, time and anything
> existing in universe! Why?..
Coz' it ain't. See above.
> 4. Every laws of nature must obey the invarience of c but the speed of
> light c is not such for anylaw! Why?..
Huh? If you're still clear on what you intended, rewrite and explain.
> Could it be that it is a
> hypothesis which was proved by Michelson-Morly experiment in the past?
That experiment showed the speed of light not to be dependent on the motion
of
the observer IIRC. Alings nicely with Einstein if I may believe the experts.
> 5. The space must be distorted, the time must be dilated in order that
> the speed of light being an invariant! (because of this is consequence
> of the above four privilegies of the light) . . .Why???
The 'above four privileges' weren't granted AFAIK.
> 6. Nothing can move at the speed exceeding the speed of light c! In
> fact, the distances between the planets are far from each other about
> many years for moving at speed of light. If so:
> - which of speed, or which of transport, or which of communication can
> my God get in order to care the human, rules the world and to manage
> the universe?
Beats me. Warp drive? Hyperspace?
> - Is there God in your mind? What and how is your God?
Right... There's many gods in my mind, your god, the Popes god, the
Ayatollahs god...
Al whining, jealous little cocksuckers if you ask me.
> Please sir is not angry with this donkey! Please answer one by one! If
> don't have SR, don't also have GR and your thing which being a CURVED
> VERSION. thus, only talk about SR!
Yup.. Sure....
> Please do not use many insults on this forum!
Ok. Promised.
> Oh! My God! ..What a pity!
I agree on that one.
> See you!
No you don't.
- Next message: Randy Poe: "Re: The outcome of Einstein's year"
- Previous message: Tom Roberts: "Re: Derivation of Lorentz from basic assumptions"
- In reply to: Minh511_at_ninhthuanpt.com.vn: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]