Re: LeSagian Gravitational Field Momentum Flux linked to EM/QM constants

From: Mike (eleatis_at_yahoo.gr)
Date: 09/27/04 

Date: 27 Sep 2004 09:08:25 -0700

Paul Stowe <ps@acompletelyjunkaddress.net> wrote in message news:<jneel0p61kd2g3os75as9lai9bm6i825vg@4ax.com>...

[snip]
>
> and the rate of mass increase would then be,
>
> m' = Q/c^2
>
> Now let's take the Earth,
>
> m' = 4pi(2.4E-19)6.0E+24(6.4E+06)/(3.0E+08)^2 = 1.3E-03 kg/sec
>
> OK, in 5 Billion Years (1.6E+17 secs) we get,
>
> 1.3E-03(1.6E+17) = 2.1E+14 kg
>
> In the grand scheme of things, that's NOT a detectable change. It's
> less than 1 part in 10^10th power, integrated over a 5 billion year
> period!

Not a detectable change? Your figure means that the mass of earth has
roughly doubled in that period. Do you call that insignificant?

Then, if the mass of the universe has roughly doubled in that period
due to graviton absorption, this means gravity forces are time
dependent. Eventually, all gravitons will be absorbed and then what?

Your theory is easily falsifiable. If the mass of the earth has
doubled in that period, every half of material present would be made
of graviton "stuff".

Do you realize the ramifications of the material graviton flux theory?
It is as absurd as anything can get. Goes beyond crackpot theory. It's
plain insanity.

Mike

>
> > Then, do the mass increase of planets due to gravity absorption and
> > resulting orbital changes match observations?
>
> Not measurably...
>
> > More importantly, how does chemical composition change with graviton
> > absorption? Has any such change beem detected?
>
> Ah, totally unknown at this time...
>
> Paul Stowe

Relevant Pages

  • Re: LeSagian Gravitational Field Momentum Flux linked to EM/QM constants
    ... Your figure means that the mass of earth has ... due to graviton absorption, this means gravity forces are time ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
    ... Where q is the power flux per unit area of the graviton field. ... Thus, the 'delta' or interacting component of q is, ... interacting material particle... ... K = mass absorption coefficient ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
    ... > Where q is the power flux per unit area of the graviton field. ... > mass we say, ... > N = graviton particle density (particles per unit volume) ... > interacting material particle... ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Heim theory
    ... >> generate mass numbers which are known via experiment to a rather high ... > (spin-2 graviton). ... > maths right now in spite of all the hype. ... to stress that it's just a theory, needs experimental verification, and ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: Question: How can graviton escape from black holes?
    ... > Everyone know that black hole have a so big mass that even photons ... > space time around the black hole. ... I know that these graviton have never been observed, ... Because the Universe attributes the quantity known as mass upon it. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)