Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation

From: bv_schornak (nowhere_at_schornak.de)
Date: 09/27/04 

Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:31:50 +0000 (UTC)

  George Hammond wrote:

>bv_schornak wrote:
>
>>George Hammond wrote:
>>
>>>bv_schornak wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>The problem is not as trivial as it seems - it is the difference
>>>>between an observer looking at a rotating object and an observer
>>>>standing on the surface of the object, looking at the outside. I
>>>>would agree with [Hammond] (index with one item) if the universe
>>>>would be a hollow sphere, illuminated with little light bulbs in
>>>>a mirrored order on both hemispheres, and this Universe would be
>>>>rotating around Earth...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>[Hammond]
>>>Well do you agree that the right hand door of your
>>>Toyota truck is a mirror image ot the left hand door?
>>>
>>>
>>The reply to this question was posted (but not answered).
>>
>
>[Hammond]
>Yeah and your answer is wrong and my answer
>is right... the L and R doors of a car
>ARE MIRROR SYMMETRIC.
>

How many cars did you design? Do you have a proof for that?

>>>I mean that's the point..... that the motor-sensory cortex
>>>in the Left Brain is a mirror symmetric copy of the
>>>motor-sensory cortex in the right brain.
>>> And also, the motor cortex in front of the rolandic
>>>fissure is a mirror symmetric image of the sensory
>>>cortex which lies behind the rolandic fissure.
>>>See a map of this at:
>>>
>>> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/Fig15.jpg
>>>
>>>This map by the way is not made up by me... it is copied right out
>>>of _Gray's Anatomy_ !
>>>
>>>
>>Have a look at this website - even if the conclusions and some
>>of the given "facts" are quite dubious - neither [Hammond] nor
>>[Schornak] can compete with the knowledge of the guy who wrote
>>that stuff about neurosciences:
>>
>
>[Hammond]
>Snip irrelevant google search citation.
>Speak for yourself Schornak.... frankly having discovered
>the neuropsychological basis of the "Structural Model"
>in Psychology (Hammond 1994, peer reviewed literature)
>I know more than the entire field of neuropsychology!
>

I always speak for myself, Hammond - what is irrelevant or not
is not your private decision. Either someting is true or it is
not, regardless of [Hammond]'s opinion and lies.

Have a look at the postings about Cronklin, then you will know
that you told lies three times instead of admitting your claim
isn't true!

>>Moreover, the reliable (verifiable) facts disprove all of your
>>claims with ease.
>>
>
>[Hammond]
>That's a bunch of ignorant bull***.
>

You shouldn't put into your mouth what you don't eat. Have you
ever had something called "education"? Even _very_ poor people
don't throw such unpleasant words at other people.

>>Maybe you should re-design your website?
>>
>
>[Hammond]
>More ignorant bull***.
>

Do you like the taste of that stuff so much that you put it in
your mouth that often?

It's your replacement for chewing gum, I guess...

>>The
>>linked site looks like a "scientific proof of god" should look
>>like (it's really professional).
>>
>
>[Hammond]
>Don't make me laugh. You think some 2nd string academic
>hack who has never discovered anything of importance is
>going to give pointers to the guy who has discovered the
>neuropsychological origin of the "Structural Model" a problem
>the whole field of neuroscience has been trying to solve for
>100 years.... don't make me laugh.
>

George - that's not "Rambo against the rest of the world" like
you, it is an organisation you definitely cannot compete with.
The knowledge of the guy who wrote that pages is overwhelming,
if I compare it with [Hammond]'s "not even amateur" statements
you spread all over the usenet.

<http://www.peace-files.com/ALCATRAS/image89I.JPG>

Just have a look how many people worked together to gather all
the stuff for that website. Do you think you are worthy enough
to kiss the soles of their shoes???

Greetings from Augsburg

Bernhard Schornak

Quantcast