Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity.
From: FrediFizzx (fredifizzx_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/28/04
- Next message: Pentcho Valev: "Relativity as an axiomatic system"
- Previous message: Eugene Stefanovich: "Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity."
- In reply to: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity."
- Next in thread: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity."
- Reply: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 23:29:06 -0700
"Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@vianet.on.ca> wrote in message
news:2202379a.0409271008.4faf1fd4@posting.google.com...
| "FrediFizzx" <fredifizzx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<2rn2lvF1cdgl3U1@uni-berlin.de>...
|
| > When you change frames, they are not going to be the same photons that
the
| > laser created. In a "picture" with a relativistic medium, all that
counts
| > is the point at which the photon is being destroyed. A photon created
at
| > point A is not the same "entity" at B when detected. In my quantum
vacuum
| > charge model, all gauge bosons are composites of virtual fermions that
are
| > bound.
|
| >Photons do not have intrinsic invariant EM properties.
| > FrediFizzx
|
| I argue they do. I think that because I underastand an
| individual photon can be polarized, correct me if I'm
| wrong please.
Only by destroying them; then they are no more. Well, it matters not. My
work here is done. I am convinced that Eugene has shown quite well that if
the quantum vacuum is not a medium at tree level then the result is
instantaneous interactions. Which is OK when you can get valid results.
There is usually more than one way to skin a cat. Of course I don't think
instantaneous interactions can happen much past about a fermi because vacuum
charge = +,- sqrt(hbar*c). Which allows for virtual particles and even
"less than virtual" particles. Dual space is the solution IMHO. Space and
time get messy down where they are being defined.
FrediFizzx
- Next message: Pentcho Valev: "Relativity as an axiomatic system"
- Previous message: Eugene Stefanovich: "Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity."
- In reply to: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity."
- Next in thread: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity."
- Reply: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|