Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS
From: Alan (gper_at_mindless.com)
Date: 09/29/04
- Next message: Robert B. Winn: "Re: Physicists are firmly entrenched in the sensational promotion of archaic methodologies"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- In reply to: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS"
- Next in thread: Goran Dhemmeog: "Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 28 Sep 2004 19:04:33 -0700
"George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<I8ednYxYmM7je6vcRVn-vQ@comcast.com>...
> "Liberator Veritatis" <LiberatorVeritatis@houston.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:4bscj0hs4lvpdahhk2m41akqbmnmmj16el@4ax.com...
> > On 1 Sep 2004 07:32:31 -0700, gper@mindless.com (Alan) wrote:
> >
> > >[snip]
> > >> 1. You don't really care whether there is a God or not.
> > >> Fact is it is doubful that any amount of intellectual
> > >> talk or scientific evidence would convince you.
> > >> You are only convinced of anything when the majority
> > >> tells you.
> > >>
> > >> 2. What you are really pissed about is that someone like ME
> > >> (a natural born political rival) is the one who has discovered it.
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > >
> > >You have contradicted yourself.
> > >
> > >For (2) to be true, "Liberator" would actually have to believe you
> > >HAVE discovered it, which according to (1) isn't very likely.
> > >
> > >SPOG is equally logical. Just more complex.
> >
> > For that matter, even if I did believe all that, how could I not care
> > whether or not god exists but be pissed off that he has discovered
> > that god exists?
>
> [Hammond]
> Its obvious to me sarge.
[snip]
That's the problem, Mr. Hammond. I wish you got it. _It's obvious to
you, but it's wrong._
What you said above is nonsense. My argument, and Liberator's, clearly
show this, but "Its obvious to me"???
Your thought processes are not in accord with the universe, sir. You
have admitted problems in the past. Recognize that the above is
symptomatic of those problems.
You can "invent" any sort of reality you want. As a "mental exercise",
that's fine, but if you DON'T want those problems you've had to
continue, you must adjust "your" reality to the universe's - after
all, the universe hasn't been very accommodating in matching it's
reality to yours, has it?
- Next message: Robert B. Winn: "Re: Physicists are firmly entrenched in the sensational promotion of archaic methodologies"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- In reply to: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS"
- Next in thread: Goran Dhemmeog: "Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|