Re: Physicists are firmly entrenched in the sensational promotion of archaic methodologies

From: Robert B. Winn (rbwinn3_at_juno.com)
Date: 09/29/04 

Date: 28 Sep 2004 19:15:08 -0700

"Bill Hobba" <bhobba@rubbish.net.au> wrote in message news:<WYk6d.7454$5O5.5036@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
> "Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
> news:a17e5e0e.0409271943.1c1f544c@posting.google.com...
> > "Bill Hobba" <bhobba@rubbish.net.au> wrote in message
> news:<k2I5d.5511$5O5.2308@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
> > > "Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
> > > news:a17e5e0e.0409260318.b073753@posting.google.com...
> > > > "Bill Hobba" <bhobba@rubbish.net.au> wrote in message
> news:<Csl5d.4334$5O5.2739@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
> > > > > "Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:a17e5e0e.0409250527.5e44fbfe@posting.google.com...
> > > > > > "Ahmed Ouahi, Architect" <ahmed.ouahi@welho.com> wrote in message
> news:<cj1tq7$t4j$1@nyytiset.pp.htv.fi>...
> > > > > > > ............... ...Physicists like to think that all you
> have
> > > to do
> > > is
> > > > > > > say, these are the conditions, now what happens
> next??????????.............
> > > > > > > ...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -- Richard P. Feynman
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
> > > > > > > Best Regards!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > Physicists can write pages of insults until you figure out the
> correct
> > > > > > equations. Then they have nothing to say.
> > > > >
> > > > > You rubbish has been demonstrated incorrect on numerous occasions.
> > > > >
> > > > > Bill
> > > > >
> > > > > > Robert B. Winn
> > > >
> > > > So go right ahead and demonstrate.
> > >
> > > Sure thing - simply peruse the rubbish of the following:
> > >
> > >
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=413FD86F.3ACB%40attglobal.net
> > >
> > > And note John Andersons conclusion.
> > >
> > > For further evidence of your lack of understanding all one needs to do
> is
> > > look at what Dirk has documented
> > >
> > >
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=mSK%25c.240793%24mh3.12328043%40phobos.telenet-ops.be
> > >
> > > Bill
> > >
> > >
> > > Something I said ten years ago
> > > > does not count because I was not using velocity of light. I was
> > > > trying to understand what you were saying about speed of light. Let's
> > > > see your demonstration.
> > > > Robert B. Winn
> >
> > Well, I am sorry to have to be the one to inform you of this, Bill,
> > but a photon traveling along the x axis in the -x direction has a
> > velocity of -c. I am sure it would have been less traumatic if a
> > scientist could have told you this instead of a welder.
>
> As usual for cranks context shifting is one of their most powerful alleys.
> No one doubts what you said above - it is the conclusions you draw from it
> as espoused posts I liked to that is in question.
>
> However since your rubbish has been discussed time and time again by myself
> and others it is useless to engage you in such again. Your stupidity is
> available for all to see and form their own conclusions.
>
> Bill
>
> > Robert B. Winn

Well, since I am so stupid, then just quit responding to my posts.
Robert B. winn

Relevant Pages