sci.physics.relativity
By Thread
6621 messages sorted by: [ date ]
Starting: 09/30/04
Ending: 10/31/04
- zero and infinity Revisited Max Keon (10/31/04)
- Is Einstein's Principle of Equivalence true? Louis Nielsen (10/30/04)
- Error #1 in USAF Study on UFO Physics Jack Sarfatti (10/30/04)
- Galileo's Relativity & Newton's Relativity. Daniel Weston (10/30/04)
- How to built a universal clock Ken Seto (10/30/04)
- Re: Religious terminology question TMG (10/30/04)
- [OT in SPR] NOMINATION - George Hammond for Usenet Kook of the Month (was: Re: Hammond Teh Moderator) Peter J Ross (10/30/04)
- Re: Hammond Teh Moderator -> Re: Proposal- alt.sci.relativistic-god.moderated bv_schornak (10/29/04)
- Re: Hammond Teh Moderator -> Re: Proposal- alt.sci.relativistic-god.moderated George Hammond (10/29/04)
- Imagination!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.................. ... Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (10/29/04)
- Pure Science!!!!!!!!!!!!!................ ... Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (10/29/04)
- Kerry anti-war was really the communist's peace plan Mitchell (10/29/04)
- Roger Penrose Nonlocality of Gravity Energy & Other Matters Jack Sarfatti (10/29/04)
- Re: Roger Penrose Nonlocality of Gravity Energy & Other Matters vonroach (10/29/04)
- Zero Point Energy & Gravity Jack Sarfatti (10/28/04)
- effect of high speed of electron on current amitmishra.mits_at_gmail.com (10/28/04)
- TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES V ertner Vergon (10/28/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Dirk Van de moortel (10/28/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Tom Roberts (10/28/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Eugene Shubert (10/28/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES V ertner Vergon (10/28/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Bill Hobba (10/28/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES V ertner Vergon (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Bill Hobba (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES V ertner Vergon (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Tom Roberts (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Bill Hobba (10/30/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Mike (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Tom Roberts (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES V ertner Vergon (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Androcles (10/30/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Androcles (10/28/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES robert j. kolker (10/28/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES V ertner Vergon (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Tom Roberts (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES greywolf42 (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Tom Roberts (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Androcles (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES V ertner Vergon (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES V ertner Vergon (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES V ertner Vergon (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES TomGee (10/29/04)
- Higgs field can be SpaceTime? newzguy (10/28/04)
- Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (10/28/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/28/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (10/28/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Bilge (10/29/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (10/29/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Bilge (10/29/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (10/30/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Sam Wormley (10/30/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Bilge (10/30/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (10/30/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (10/29/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Bilge (10/29/04)
- Measuring rest Mass in GR (kst) Ken S. Tucker (10/27/04)
- Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (10/27/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Old Man (10/28/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR ad (10/28/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (10/28/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Old Man (10/28/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (10/29/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Androcles (10/29/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (10/29/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Androcles (10/29/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Myxococcus xanthus (10/28/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Old Man (10/28/04)
- Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal Jack Sarfatti (10/27/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system John Kennaugh (10/27/04)
- Space Culture 101 Gordon Muir (10/27/04)
- Yes, McAnally? eleaticus (10/27/04)
- Lattice shearing Mayank (10/27/04)
- A Brief Description of IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) Ken Seto (10/26/04)
- Dr. Tom Roberts Examines the Shubertian Clock Eugene Shubert (10/26/04)
- Mathimatical exercise penguinista (10/26/04)
- Orbits About Black Holes - Free Interactive Animation George Jones (10/26/04)
- "TIME DILATION" ADDENDUM V ertner Vergon (10/26/04)
- A definition of time. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Harry (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Daniel Weston (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Daniel Weston (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Creighton Hogg (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Daniel Weston (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Paul B. Andersen (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. TomGee (10/30/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Daniel Weston (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Daniel Weston (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Daniel Weston (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Daniel Weston (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Daniel Weston (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Daniel Weston (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Daniel Weston (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. TomGee (10/28/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Bill Hobba (10/29/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Harry (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. stephen_at_nomail.com (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Dirk Van de moortel (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Harry (10/26/04)
- TIME DILATION V ertner Vergon (10/26/04)
- The NEXT MASTER - THE MOONIE LIFE Gordon Muir (10/26/04)
- Space Culture 101 Gordon Muir (10/26/04)
- The Retreat From Reality jahn (10/26/04)
- Re: Important Interrobang Cartel news TMG (10/26/04)
- Nonlocality of Energy in General Relativity Jack Sarfatti (10/26/04)
- Maxwell's Displacement Current jahn (10/25/04)
- Ref re: spacelike singularity + origin of the universe? Paul E (10/25/04)
- TIME FLOW V ertner Vergon (10/25/04)
- Pioneer Anomaly & Galactic Halo Jack Sarfatti (10/25/04)
- The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity Serutcipq (10/25/04)
- UEB / kst on Planck Ken S. Tucker (10/25/04)
- Re: Capt kirk to really boldly go nightbat (10/25/04)
- Re: definition of a clock in relativity theory Eric Baird (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminalinformation transfer. nightbat (10/25/04)
- Pushing Gravity, what do independent reviews say about this book? Paul Stowe (10/24/04)
- Electromagnetism in general relativity: two questions Amantine (10/24/04)
- Re: Electromagnetism in general relativity: two questions Tom Roberts (10/24/04)
- Re: Electromagnetism in general relativity: two questions Bilge (10/25/04)
- Re: Electromagnetism in general relativity: two questions Amantine (10/25/04)
- Re: Electromagnetism in general relativity: two questions Ken S. Tucker (10/25/04)
- Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Greysky (10/24/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Uncle Al (10/24/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. bernard.chaverondier (10/24/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/24/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Greysky (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Greysky (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Greysky (10/26/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. bernard.chaverondier (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. bernard.chaverondier (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. bernard.chaverondier (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/27/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. chaverondier (10/27/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/28/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. chaverondier (10/28/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/28/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. bernard.chaverondier (10/29/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/30/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. chaverondier (10/31/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. RP (10/31/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Greysky (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Androcles (10/24/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Luigi Caselli (10/24/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Paul Lawler (10/24/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
- Mind-set. Len Gaasenbeek (10/24/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Androcles (10/24/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Len Gaasenbeek (10/26/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Len Gaasenbeek (10/26/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Bill Hobba (10/28/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Len Gaasenbeek (10/28/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Bill Hobba (10/29/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Len Gaasenbeek (10/29/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Androcles (10/29/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Len Gaasenbeek (10/30/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Androcles (10/30/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Bill Hobba (10/30/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Len Gaasenbeek (10/30/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Bilge (10/29/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Len Gaasenbeek (10/26/04)
- Exotic Vacuum Hedgehog Pioneer 10/11 Anomaly Jack Sarfatti (10/24/04)
- NONLOCALITY OF GRAVITY ENERGY & WMD Jack Sarfatti (10/24/04)
- Re: nonstationary states N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/24/04)
- In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eugene Shubert (10/23/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eric Gisse (10/24/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eugene Shubert (10/24/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eugene Shubert (10/25/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory YBM (10/25/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eric Gisse (10/26/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eugene Shubert (10/26/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eric Gisse (10/26/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eugene Shubert (10/28/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eric Gisse (10/28/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eugene Shubert (10/28/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eric Gisse (10/29/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eugene Shubert (10/29/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory YBM (10/29/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory YBM (10/24/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eric Gisse (10/24/04)
- Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/23/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Androcles (10/24/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/24/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Androcles (10/24/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/25/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Androcles (10/26/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. sal (10/26/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Androcles (10/26/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/28/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Androcles (10/28/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/24/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Tom Roberts (10/24/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. John Kennaugh (10/25/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. jahn (10/25/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. sal (10/26/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/27/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Eric Gisse (10/27/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/28/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Eric Gisse (10/29/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/31/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Androcles (10/27/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Randy Poe (10/28/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/31/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. John Kennaugh (10/28/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. sal (10/28/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Androcles (10/24/04)
- Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity? Elpoepq (10/23/04)
- Re: Spoon. TMG (10/23/04)
- Re: The Matter of "Dark Matter" ande452_at_attglobal.net (10/23/04)
- Re: Are Unified Field Theories Justified? ande452_at_attglobal.net (10/23/04)
- The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Karl-Hugo Weesberg (10/23/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Paul Stowe (10/23/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Eugene Shubert (10/23/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Bill Hobba (10/23/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Ken Seto (10/24/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Harry (10/25/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Henri Wilson (10/25/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Tom Roberts (10/26/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Dirk Van de moortel (10/26/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Paul B. Andersen (10/26/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Dirk Van de moortel (10/26/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Henri Wilson (10/27/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Randy Poe (10/27/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Henri Wilson (10/27/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Dirk Van de moortel (10/28/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Bill Rowe (10/27/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Titan Point (10/27/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... robert j. kolker (10/27/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Henri Wilson (10/27/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Titan Point (10/28/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Henri Wilson (10/28/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... robert j. kolker (10/28/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Henri Wilson (10/31/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Titan Point (10/29/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Eric Gisse (10/30/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... David Evens (10/30/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... The Ghost In The Machine (10/27/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... robert j. kolker (10/27/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... The Ghost In The Machine (10/28/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... robert j. kolker (10/28/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... The Ghost In The Machine (10/28/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... shevek (10/30/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Henri Wilson (10/31/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... robert j. kolker (10/27/04)
- Light model tussock (10/23/04)
- NASA Pioneer Anomaly is a Hedgehog Dark Energy Vacuum Point Defect Jack Sarfatti (10/23/04)
- GR and Stronger Gravity At a Distance Mitchell (10/23/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Bilge (10/25/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/25/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Bilge (10/25/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/26/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Bilge (10/26/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Dirk Van de moortel (10/27/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Bill Hobba (10/28/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) AllYou! (10/28/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/25/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Bilge (10/25/04)
- Well, Bilge? Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Drag Free Control jahn (10/22/04)
- Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bilge (10/23/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Eugene Shubert (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Eugene Shubert (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (10/23/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bilge (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bilge (10/26/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bilge (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bilge (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (10/26/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bilge (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Martin Hogbin (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/23/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/23/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/23/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Thomas Jones (10/23/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/23/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. xxein (10/23/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Martin Hogbin (10/24/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. robert j. kolker (10/24/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Martin Hogbin (10/24/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/24/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/24/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Martin Hogbin (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. shevek (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. shevek (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. shevek (10/30/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. greywolf42 (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. greywolf42 (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Daniel Weston (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Daniel Weston (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Androcles (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (10/30/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (10/30/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Daniel Weston (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bilge (10/23/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/22/04)
- Frames and equations eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Re: Frames and equations Martin Hogbin (10/22/04)
- Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Titan Point (10/22/04)
- Hunh, Titan? eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Ken S. Tucker (10/23/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Titan Point (10/29/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Eric Gisse (10/30/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/30/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Titan Point (10/30/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Uncle Al (10/30/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/30/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/30/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Uncle Al (10/30/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Uncle Al (10/30/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/31/04)
- Re: Frames and equations Paul Draper (10/22/04)
- Re: Frames and equations Bilge (10/24/04)
- Special for The Ghost in the Machine eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Well, Dirk? eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Why Uncle Al usually just name-calls eleaticus (10/21/04)
- C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption eleaticus (10/21/04)
- Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption Van Jacques (10/21/04)
- Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption Uncle Al (10/21/04)
- Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption ZZBunker (10/22/04)
- Well, ZZBunker? Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, ZZBunker? Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption Uncle Al (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, ZZBunker? Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption ZZBunker (10/23/04)
- Uncle assAl-ry number 43 eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl-ry number 43 David Evens (10/25/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl-ry number 43 eleaticus (10/25/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl-ry number 43 David Evens (10/26/04)
- Re: Well, ZZBunker? Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption ZZBunker (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, ZZBunker? Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Well, ZZBunker? Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption ZZBunker (10/23/04)
- Well, ZZBunker? Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption eleaticus (10/22/04)
- B. Newtonian Micheslon-Morley vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/21/04)
- A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/21/04)
- Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Uncle Al (10/21/04)
- Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/21/04)
- Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/22/04)
- Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Daryl McCullough (10/22/04)
- Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Androcles (10/22/04)
- Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Uncle Al (10/22/04)
- Uncle AssAl-ery number 4003. eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Daryl McCullough (10/22/04)
- Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Daryl McCullough (10/23/04)
- Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/22/04)
- Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Paul Draper (10/22/04)
- Yes, Paul?Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Re: Yes, Paul?Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/23/04)
- Lordy, Hobba, get it straight. Or are you that incompetent? eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Lordy, Hobba, get it straight. Or are you that incompetent? Bill Hobba (10/23/04)
- Re: Yes, Paul?Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) ZZBunker (10/23/04)
- Re: Yes, Paul?Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/23/04)
- Re: Yes, Paul?Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Mike (10/23/04)
- Re: Yes, Paul?Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/24/04)
- Re: Yes, Paul?Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/24/04)
- Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Androcles (10/23/04)
- The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! Daryl McCullough (10/23/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! Daryl McCullough (10/23/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! Daryl McCullough (10/24/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! eleaticus (10/24/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! Bill Hobba (10/24/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! Daryl McCullough (10/25/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! eleaticus (10/25/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! Daryl McCullough (10/25/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! eleaticus (10/26/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! Daryl McCullough (10/26/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! eleaticus (10/26/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! Daryl McCullough (10/26/04)
- Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Uncle Al (10/22/04)
- Uncle assAl-ry number 54322 eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Mike (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Uncle Al (10/22/04)
- Uncle assAl-ry number 410052 eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Uncle Al (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Uncle assAl-ry number 4005 eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Mike (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Uncle Al (10/22/04)
- Uncle assAl-ry number 4004 eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl-ry number 4004 Edward Green (10/23/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl-ry number 4004 eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl-ry number 4004 Edward Green (10/24/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl-ry number 4004 eleaticus (10/24/04)
- Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/22/04)
- A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/21/04)
- Article: Relativity tested on a shoestring budget Robert Karl Stonjek (10/21/04)
- Re: A New Definition for TIME Dirk Van de moortel (10/21/04)
- Does Newton's law f = (ma) hold true in all cases? Len Gaasenbeek (10/21/04)
- Re: Does Newton's law f = (ma) hold true in all cases? Androcles (10/21/04)
- Correction Androcles (10/21/04)
- Correction Androcles (10/21/04)
- Re: Does Newton's law f = (ma) hold true in all cases? penguinista (10/21/04)
- Re: Does Newton's law f = (ma) hold true in all cases? shuba (10/21/04)
- Re: Does Newton's law f = (ma) hold true in all cases? Bill Hobba (10/21/04)
- Re: Relativity and Reasonableness Tests Bilge (10/21/04)
- Frame Dragging Gedanken Paradox? Ken S. Tucker (10/21/04)
- Frame dragging confirmed according to researchers... Eric Gisse (10/21/04)
- Mileva Maric - any educated opions? Jack Jones (10/21/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? Dirk Van de moortel (10/21/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? AllYou! (10/21/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? Dirk Van de moortel (10/21/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? AllYou! (10/21/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? David Canzi -- non-mailable address (10/21/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? Dirk Van de moortel (10/21/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/21/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? AllYou! (10/21/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? EjP (10/21/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? David Evens (10/22/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? Jack Jones (10/22/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? Bill Hobba (10/24/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? Jack Jones (10/24/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? Bill Hobba (10/24/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? greywolf42 (10/24/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? robert j. kolker (10/24/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? Jack Jones (10/25/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? greywolf42 (10/25/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? David Evens (10/30/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? robert j. kolker (10/30/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? Bill Hobba (10/24/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? greywolf42 (10/25/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? Jack Jones (10/22/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? Dirk Van de moortel (10/21/04)
- one more time, Androcles eleaticus (10/21/04)
- A history of mechanics Franco (10/21/04)
- sal's persuasive rhetoric. Androcles (10/20/04)
- Yes, McAnally? eleaticus (10/20/04)
- To forever irrationally argue against instrumentalism Patrick Reany (10/20/04)
- Some real equivalence jahn (10/20/04)
- paradox in quantum mechanics jsp (10/20/04)
- Re: Proof of time? Paul Cardinale (10/20/04)
- General Relativistc Maxwell Equations for the Mass ? josefmatz (10/20/04)
- Newby - Don't Shoot The Crow (10/20/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Eugene Shubert (10/20/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Martin Hogbin (10/20/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Eugene Shubert (10/20/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Titan Point (10/21/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Eugene Shubert (10/21/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Titan Point (10/22/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Eugene Shubert (10/22/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/22/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Eugene Shubert (10/22/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/22/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Titan Point (10/23/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Eugene Shubert (10/21/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Bilge (10/21/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Eugene Shubert (10/21/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Eugene Shubert (10/21/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Bilge (10/24/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Creighton Hogg (10/24/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Martin Hogbin (10/20/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Tom Roberts (10/20/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Eugene Shubert (10/20/04)