Re: GPS calculations
From: Tom Roberts (tjroberts_at_lucent.com)
Date: 09/30/04
- Next message: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: velocity of light in the Lorentz equations"
- Previous message: Ken Seto: "Re: What happened to Dingle?"
- Maybe in reply to: Paul B. Andersen: "Re: GPS calculations"
- Next in thread: Henri Wilson: "Re: GPS calculations"
- Reply: Henri Wilson: "Re: GPS calculations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:51:27 -0500
Henri Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:55:55 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@hia.no>
> wrote:
>>But since GR is capable of predicting how to adjust the rate of the clock
>>before it is launched, we do not have to adjust the clock in orbit.
>>And - as we know - GR got it exactly right for the GPS satellite clocks.
>
> GR got it wrong by at least 20%
Why do you keep repeating this falsehood????
GR got the relationship between GPS satellite clocks and ground clocks
right to an accuracy of at least 0.1%. That's about as good as one can
expect, because small effects ignored in a GR analysis are that large
(effects of sun, moon, orbital errors, ...).
> In fact the 'free fall' error has never been properly measured
Hmmm. The GPS satellite clocks have been measured probably millions of
times and compared to ground clocks.
Tom Roberts tjroberts@lucent.com
- Next message: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: velocity of light in the Lorentz equations"
- Previous message: Ken Seto: "Re: What happened to Dingle?"
- Maybe in reply to: Paul B. Andersen: "Re: GPS calculations"
- Next in thread: Henri Wilson: "Re: GPS calculations"
- Reply: Henri Wilson: "Re: GPS calculations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|