Re: Question about God=G_uv
From: bv_schornak (nowhere_at_schornak.de)
Date: 09/30/04
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Maybe in reply to: stew dean: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:55:17 +0000 (UTC)
George Hammond wrote:
>bv_schornak wrote:
>
>>Timberwoof wrote:
>>
>>>Earle Jones wrote:
>>>
>>>>George Hammond wrote:
>>>>
>>>>*
>>>>Advice to anyone with any interest at all in Hammond's thinking:
>>>>
>>>>Please read:
>>>>
>>>> http://home.pacifier.com/~dkossy/hammond.html
>>>>
>>>>This is a fairly unbiased description in language that is easily
>>>>understandable.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Thanks for that link.
>>>
>>>While reading this I was wondering whether it was a parody or something
>>>
>that
>
>>>might have been published in the JIR.
>>>
>>>It struck me that there was no reference to the four elements of the
>>>
>Greeks, and
>
>>>no reference to the many more political parties that exist in other
>>>
>countries.
>
>>>(Based on population, there is a serious deficit in the number of
>>>
>political
>
>>>parties in the united States.) I enjoyed the phrase, "This theory not
>>>
>only
>
>>>provides a proof of the Bicameral/Two-Party systemS." I was not
>>>
>previously aware
>
>>>that the Bicameral/Two-Party system needed proving.
>>>
>>>The diagram depicted on the cover of the book is "so bad it's not even
>>>
>wrong."
>
>
>>But it is a good overwiew what's in [Hammond]'s head. Notice
>>how straight the light beams go to the backside of the head!
>>
>
>[Hammond]
>That's anatomically accurate... that is the path of the Optic Nerve to the
>Occipital (visual) Cortex in the back of the head, where the 4-quadrants of
>the visual field are projected onto the 4-quadrants of the Occipital Cortex
>formed by the intersection of the Calcharine and Medial fissures of the
>brain.
>
>
>
>>The picture shows a really huge "BGD" (to be true - it seems
>>there's no brain at all, not even a "cubic" one)...
>>
>>
>
>[Hammond]
>I paid an unemployed artist $100 to draw it for me... I think he copied
>one of those "Oscar Statues" they give out at the Hollywood award
>ceremonies.... I've nicknamed the picture "Oscar".
>
Okay, George. I see this was a really "bad reply"
from my side. I shouldn't have posted this. It is
unfair (pointed against your person, not your ar-
guments).
MY APOLOGIES!
I am truely sorry and will keep care to stay with
the arguments in future postings.
Greetings from Augsburg
Bernhard Schornak
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Maybe in reply to: stew dean: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
