Re: Question about God=G_uv
From: Timberwoof (timberwoof_at_stimpberawoofm.com)
Date: 09/30/04
- Next message: Daniel Weston: "Re: Define a clock"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Maybe in reply to: stew dean: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:28:36 +0000 (UTC)
In article <58GdnQyaF6enwMbcRVn-qQ@comcast.com>,
"George Hammond" <nowhere@nomailspam.com> wrote:
> [Hammond]
> My fans are the "silent majority" they don't pay attention to the
> Internet, they don't listen to talk radio, they're too busy being
> normal.
Ladies and gentlemen, you heard it here first[1], a new and never before seen
informal fallacy of logic, the Appeal to Lots of Invisible People.
[1] Well, I think Nixon actually did it first, but he was a crook.
> I'm here only because its a fast, free and powerful means of
> publication. The fact that it's over run with kooks doesn't
> phase me or surprise me.
Which definition of Kook are you using? Carl Sagan, a noted astronomer with
graduate degrees, a professorship, many peer-reviewed articles, a career at
NASA, and many published books, had a good one. Unfortunately, you fit his
definition.
-- Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com Otto: "Haha! Apes do not read philosophy!" Wanda: "Yes, they do. They just don't understand it."
- Next message: Daniel Weston: "Re: Define a clock"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Maybe in reply to: stew dean: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|