Re: An Open Letter to [Hammond]

From: bv_schornak (nowhere_at_schornak.de)
Date: 10/01/04


Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:21:48 +0000 (UTC)

Earle Jones wrote:

>*
>What if we surveyed the members of the National Academy of Sciences
>-- that represents some of the 'great' scientists. What would they
>say?
>
>Well, it's been done -- first in 1916, again in 1933 and most
>recently in 1998. Here are the results, as reported in NATURE:
>
>Leading Scientists Still Reject God
>
>Nature, Vol. 394, No. 6691, p. 313 (1998)
> Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
>
>Table 1 Comparison of survey answers among "greater" scientists
>
>Belief in personal God 1914 1933 1998
> Personal belief 27.7 15.0 7.0
> Personal disbelief 52.7 68.0 72.2
> Doubt or agnosticism 20.9 17.0 20.8
>
>
>Belief in human immortality 1914 1933 1998
> Personal belief 35.2 18.0 7.9
> Personal disbelief 25.4 53.0 76.7
> Doubt or agnosticism 43.7 29.0 23.3
>
>Figures are percentages.
>
>Details:
>
> "NATURE" SURVEY -- LESS AND LESS BELIEF
>
> The follow-up study reported in "Nature" reveals that the
>rate
> of belief is lower than eight decades ago. The latest survey
> involved 517 members of the National Academy of Sciences; half
> replied. When queried about belief in "personal god," only 7%
> responded in the affirmative, while 72.2% expressed "personal
> disbelief," and 20.8% expressed "doubt or agnosticism."
>Belief in
> the concept of human immortality, i.e. life after death declined
> from the 35.2% measured in 1914 to just 7.9%. 76.7% reject the
> "human immortality" tenet, compared with 25.4% in 1914, and
>23.2%
> claimed "doubt or agnosticism" on the question, compared with
> 43.7% in Leuba's original measurement [Dr. James Leuba,
> Psychology Professor at Bryn Mawr University conducted the
> original study]. Again, though, the highest rate of belief in
> a god was found among mathematicians (14.3%, while the lowest
> was found among those in the life sciences fields -- only 5.5%.
>
> From "NATURE" 394, 313 (23 Jul 1998) Correspondence
>
>earle
>*
>

Looks like a Secular Trend in "disbelief". Maybe there's a hidden
connection to the Secular Trend in "human growth", leading to the
astonishing formula GOD != G_uv?

Greetings from Augsburg

Bernhard Schornak



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Those of us trying to help Kelleher
    ... Somehow I doubt that members of the National Academy of Sciences are ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: If Dawkins is right....
    ... Sciences in the US do not believe in a personal god. ... Note this is members not just a small group of Fellows. ...
    (uk.religion.christian)
  • Re: If Dawkins is right....
    ... Sciences in the US do not believe in a personal god. ... Note this is members not just a small group of Fellows. ...
    (uk.religion.christian)
  • Re: Ping Len GM0ONX, and other doubters
    ... Nice attack, but it isn't me that has a problem, it's the RSGB and the ... surveys would have been against the new policy. ... the members stated wishes, which were for the retention of CW for HF ... was it before or after this Survey? ...
    (uk.radio.amateur)
  • Re: UK readers only
    ... Would you take the time to register for the survey so that our views ... The ARA saw fit to give Sport ... England the details of WARA members as well for this survey. ...
    (rec.sport.rowing)