Re: Question about God=G_uv
From: wanderriver (wanderriver_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 10/01/04
- Next message: Bilge: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: Relativity Cult Limerick"
- Maybe in reply to: stew dean: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:08:22 +0000 (UTC)
<<God is caused by "General Relativity" not "Special Relativity".>>
ROTFL
"George Hammond" <nowhere@nomailspam.com> wrote in message news:<94Gdne_VPKSvX8XcRVn-pA@comcast.com>...
> <Minh511@ninhthuanpt.com.vn> wrote in message
> news:756ac1b7.0409262033.1f9901f1@posting.google.com...
> > bv_schornak <nowhere@schornak.de> wrote in message
> news:<cikapd$a9u$06$1@news.t-online.com>...
> > > Timberwoof wrote:
> > >
> > > >Assuming for the moment that this "proof" actually has any bearing on
> reality,
> > > >what bearing does it have?
> > > >
> > > >So far, my understanding about what the "God" that you say you prove
> exists is
> > > >some kind of sympathetic magic and wishful thinking based on some
> casually
> > > >observed similarities between the big-bang development of the universe
> (which
> > > >you claim didn't happen) and the development of the human brain. None
> of which
> > > >makes any useful predictions about the true nature of this "God."
> > > >
> > > >So never mind that out of the dozen or so steps that you use to
> establish your
> > > >"proof," roughly a dozen have been proven to be faulty. Let's just take
> it as
> > > >given that the "God" you prove does exist. What are its properties?
> Does it have
> > > >mass, size, charge, spin, energy, temperature? Does it have a soul, an
> ego, a
> > > >plan? Does it have a way to receive our communications or a way to
> affect the
> > > >universe? How do these things follow from your proof? What other things
> about
> > > >the universe can be learned with this concept? What things about the
> universe
> > > >does this explain better than the things we already know?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Following SPoG (GOD = 8 * pi * T_uv), [Hammond]'s "God
> > > object" is a finite quantity of matter and/or energy -
> > > probably not the thing any Christian, Jew or Muslim is
> > > worshipping...
> > >
> > >
> > > Greetings from Augsburg
> > >
> > > Bernhard Schornak
> >
> > Which speed can our God move in order to care the human and for the
> > management of universe?
> > Acording to the special theory of relativity (SR), nothing can move at
> > the speed exceeding the speed of light in a vacuum c. In fact, the
> > distance between the planets are far from each other about many years
> > for moving at speed of light. If so:
> > - which of speed, or which of transport, or which of communication
> > that can our God get in order to care the human and for the management
> > of universe?
> > - How can interpret for an agreement between the SR and the
> > traditional religions?
> > - Could it be that accepting the special theory of relativity being
> > disclaiming the human's confidence about God?
> > - How are the real sciencies?
> > ThanhMinh.
>
>
> [Hammond]
> Hey, Dr. Ho Chi Minh.... you better update your science. "Velocity" is not
> the only thing that causes a time dilation. GRAVITY also causes a
> time dilation and this phenomena is called "General Relativity", not
> "Special Relativity".
> God is caused by "General Relativity" not "Special Relativity".
>
> ====================================
> SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
> 1st mirror site:
> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
> 2nd mirror site:
> http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
> new site (under construction):
> http://home.comcast.net/~proof-of-god
> ====================================
- Next message: Bilge: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: Relativity Cult Limerick"
- Maybe in reply to: stew dean: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|