Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits
From: Bilge (dubious_at_radioactivex.lebesque-al.net)
Date: 10/01/04
- Next message: Bilge: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Previous message: wanderriver: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- Maybe in reply to: Ole D. Rughede: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Next in thread: Bilge: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:19:02 -0000
mountain man:
>"Bilge" <dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> wrote in message
>news:slrncll87v.1cq.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net...
>> mountain man:
>> >
>> >"robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote in message
>> >news:2rujc0F1fbj0oU1@uni-berlin.de...
>> >
>> >> Technology driven physics has gotten us within 15 orders of magnitude
>> >> of
>> >> the Planck Length. Classical physics (more to your liking) got us
>> >> nowhere
>> >> that close to The Bottom of Things.
>> >
>> >Classical physics is far too modern for my liking.
>> >
>> >There was a time, not too many centuries back, when everything
>> >might have been given explanation by reference to the elements
>> >of nature, the ancient elements of earth, water, air and fire. These
>> >are the elements of life, and since they have been replaced by the
>> >concepts of solid, liquid, gas and plasma, technology has sold
>> >alot of internal combustion engines, and data processing engines.
>>
>> Then I would suggest simply adopting those things as science and
>> moving on to other things, rather than trying to convince people
>> who want a more fundanental explanation than you seem to want, to
>> go along with you.
>
>
>These simple elements of nature cannot generate technology.
So what? You don't care about that anyway (apart from whatever
you need to post your uninformed diatribes).
>Most people want to see technological benefits.
So? That isn't your problem. You have your air, earth, fire
and water theory, so go off somewhere and be ecstatic.
>These things
>are about the basic foundation of physical human survival.
>IMO this takes priority over technology, for without life there
>will be no intellectualisation of physics.
Well, you certainly aren't doing much to intellectualize
physics with yours, so why do you care?
- Next message: Bilge: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Previous message: wanderriver: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- Maybe in reply to: Ole D. Rughede: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Next in thread: Bilge: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
