Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits
From: David Thomson (aether-news_at_volantis.org)
Date: 10/03/04
- Next message: Pax: "Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba"
- Previous message: David Thomson: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 13:21:30 GMT
On 2-Oct-2004, "robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote:
> > I'll bet you have the wrong idea of reductionism, though.
>
> Wrong. I know exactly what reductionism is. Reducing the whole to the
> parts and the interactions between them. It is the normal mode of science.
Let's develop this a little.
Would you agree that humans can be reduced to body organs?
Would you agree that body organs can be reduced to cells?
Would you agree that cells could be reduced to molecules?
Would you agree that molecules could be reduced to atoms?
Would you agree that atoms could be reduced to subatomic particles?
Dave
- Next message: Pax: "Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba"
- Previous message: David Thomson: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|