Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
From: George Hammond (nowhere_at_nomailspam.com)
Date: 10/04/04
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: Why is the speed of light what it is?"
- Previous message: Pax: "Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba"
- In reply to: bv_schornak: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Next in thread: bv_schornak: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: bv_schornak: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: Alan: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 09:53:15 -0400
"bv_schornak" <nowhere@schornak.de> wrote in message
news:cjoqsu$sj3$01$1@news.t-online.com...
> George Hammond wrote:
>
> >The brain *IS* a "Box". the three orthogonal cleavages of the brain
> >cause 8-lobes (the 8 corner octants of a cube).
> >
>
> You still have a probem with reality, it seems.
[Hammond]
Argumentem ad homimem
>
> >... Furthermore, I don't feel like wasting my time
> >arguing with a pedant adversary who is intent on endless destructive
> >criticism in a pointless fishing expedition for political reasons.
> >
>
> If you deny to follow the scientific way to prove your claims,
> then you shouldn't claim to be a scientist. If you can't prove
> your claims, you have no reason to call yourself a scientist.
[Hammond]
Argumentem ad homimem
>
> >There is only one way to defeat such a politically motivated person,
> >and that is politically, since "scientific truth" means nothing to such
> >person in the first place.
> >
>
> In the first place, "scientific truth" means nothing to _you_,
> George. You've proven this with every single posting - denying
> overwhelming proof against your phantasies makes you look like
> a dumb person, not like a scientist. Only those who can accept
> they were wrong can be called scientists.
[Hammond]
Unsupported assertion
>
> >So this is why you're looking at a thousand post thread... it's a
> >political manuver to kick your ass,
> >
>
> In reality, you gave thousands of proofs you cannot understand
> anything outside your fabricated view of the world. Every sci-
> entific argument we gave you is beyond your comprehension, you
> aren't able to grasp what is reality and what is the world in-
> side your head. Every human has her/his own view of the world,
> that's not the problem. Your problem is you cannot distinguish
> between the "inner" and the "outer" world...
[Hammond]
Argumentem ad hominem
>
> >and I'm not about to be
> >conned into believing that you are interested in discussing
> >math, investigating the theory, or looking for scientific truth.
> >
>
> The only person who's proven to follow this path is [Hammond].
> You neither are able to investigate nor to show your abilities
> in any field. At the moment it becomes obvious you have lost a
> debatte you are starting to divert a discussion into something
> far away from the topic. No, George - if you start to complain
> about something, you surely have to complain about yourself in
> the first place.
[Hammond]
Argumentem ad homimen
>
> Nobody is perfect - and this is valid for [Hammond], too!
>
>
> Greetings from Augsburg
>
> Bernhard Schornak
>
[Hammond]
Hey... I've got "insurance" remember.... it doesn't matter if Dembski
turns out to be just another "hostile witness".... fact is the only
legitimate
criticism of Dembski's ID is that it is a "default theory"... IOW it claims
to eliminate all scientific explanations of Evolution so therefore "by
default" ID must exist. Obviously this can never be a "proof" of ID
since you need a "causal explanation of ID" to prove it.
Hammond has now DISCOVERED THE CAUSAL MECHANISM OF ID.
therefore, even if Dembski chooses to be a hostile witness... the fact
is thE word is out that the "causal mechanism" of ID has been found
by Hammond.
The point is, all these people want is one thing... to "disprove Darwin"..
that's REALLY ALL THEY WANT TO DO. And the fact is,
Hammond has given them the superweapon that does that.... so in
the end... they will have to overlook their jealousy of Hammond
in order to "get Darwin".... which is the only thing they're really
interested
in doing.... and I predict they're going to do it... and the SPoG will
ride that tidal wave to fame and glory. ROFL
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
1st mirror site:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
2nd mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
new site (under construction):
http://home.comcast.net/~proof-of-god
====================================
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: Why is the speed of light what it is?"
- Previous message: Pax: "Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba"
- In reply to: bv_schornak: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Next in thread: bv_schornak: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: bv_schornak: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: Alan: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|