Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation

From: George Hammond (nowhere_at_nomailspam.com)
Date: 10/04/04 

Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 09:56:09 -0400

"TMG" <TMG@Nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:JpmdncXnX4nyTcPcRVn-vw@comcast.com...
> George Hammond wrote:
>
> > "David Evens" <devens@technologist.com> wrote in message
> > news:bn9ql09gbl528pe56c9h8lp71pb9esec2v@4ax.com...
> >
> >>On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:43:47 -0400, "George Hammond"
> >><nowhere@nomailspam.com> wrote:
> >>
> >
> >
> >>So, you are once again back to declaring yourself to be a career
> >>criminal specialising in fraud. Are you still halucinating that this
> >>enhances your credibility?
> >
> >
> > [Hammond]
> > Hey Nummynuts... where you been? Haven't heard from you for awhile,
> > you haven't been stalking me lately....someone told me you died for
> > chrissakes.
> >
> >
> > [Hammond]
> > I know one thing that enhances my credibility.... I've just discoverd
that
> > the SPoG confirms Bill Dembski's Intelligent Design theory... so that
> > makes TWO OF US who now believe that a scientific proof of God
> > exists and has been found. And Dembski's a real bigshot btw, his
> > _Intelligent Design_ was published by Oxford University Press!
> >
> > Any way, get a load of this:
> >
> > [Hammond]
> > First of all, Dembski is not an amateur. Furthermore he has attacked
the
> > problem of finding a "scientific proof of God" in his own original way
by
> > producing a new "scientific formulation" of the old idea of "Intelligent
> > Design".
> > The idea of "Intelligent Design" being the basis of a "SPoG" is as old
as
> > the
> > hills, in fact Isaac Newton is famous for saying:
> >
> > "In lieu of all other evidence, I take the human thumb
> > to be sufficient proof of God."
> > (Isaac Newton)
>
>
> What about all of the post Newton science?
>
> > which clearly shows he believed in it.
> > However, Dembski has come up with something new because he is a PhD
> > mathematician and an expert in Statistics. The following review of his
book
> > _No Free Lunch_ (1999 I believe) was written by a reviewer and is posted
on
> > Amazon. I suggest you read it.... and then I will explain how Hammond's
> > SPoG
> > actually PROVES that Dembski's theory is CORRECT... a fact that I'm sure
> > WmAD will take notice of:
> >
> >
> > ------------------Amazon.com review of Dembski's _No Free
> > Lunch_----------------
> >
> > 43 of 80 people found the following review helpful:
> >
> >
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/customer-reviews/0742512975/ref=cm_rev_all_1/002-5540277-0312015?%5Fencoding=UTF8&me=ATVPDKIKX0DER
>
> Better read that review you're posting Sparky, it clearly anti-Dembski.
>
> Here's another page of reviews and papers indicating Dembski is a
> sloppy, deceptive crank.
>
> http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/science/creationism/dembski.html

[Hammond]
Hey... I've got "insurance" remember.... it doesn't matter if Dembski
turns out to be just another "hostile witness".... fact is the only
legitimate
criticism of Dembski's ID is that it is a "default theory"... IOW it claims
to eliminate all scientific explanations of Evolution so therefore "by
default" ID must exist. Obviously this can never be a "proof" of ID
since you need a "causal explanation of ID" to prove it.
Hammond has now DISCOVERED THE CAUSAL MECHANISM OF ID.
therefore, even if Dembski chooses to be a hostile witness... the fact
is thE word is out that the "causal mechanism" of ID has been found
by Hammond.
  The point is, all these people want is one thing... to "disprove Darwin"..
that's REALLY ALL THEY WANT TO DO. And the fact is,
Hammond has given them the superweapon that does that.... so in
the end... they will have to overlook their jealousy of Hammond
in order to "get Darwin".... which is the only thing they're really
interested
in doing.... and I predict they're going to do it... and the SPoG will
ride that tidal wave to fame and glory. ROFL

====================================
   SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
        1st mirror site:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
        2nd mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
     new site (under construction):
http://home.comcast.net/~proof-of-god
====================================

Relevant Pages

  • Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
    ... >> Moderation is a must, not only to get rid of you graffitti artists, ... to discuss a real scientific proof of God in an unmoderated newsgroup". ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
    ... > George Hammond wrote: ... Note that Dembski is not ... >> to use two common words used to describe God. ... which is going to take an army of scientists to prove rigorously. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: God=G_uv Proof of 40k BC Creation (READ ONLY)
    ... > George Hammond wrote: ... The answer is he KNOWS what God is... ... >> This constitutes the world's first scientific proof of God, ... discovery of the world's first scientific proof ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS
    ... > George Hammond wrote: ... God is more ... That's why I say that this "miracle" of the discovery of a ... scientific proof of God WILL have some global impact on ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS
    ... > George Hammond wrote: ... God is more ... That's why I say that this "miracle" of the discovery of a ... scientific proof of God WILL have some global impact on ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)