Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation

From: bv_schornak (nowhere_at_schornak.de)
Date: 10/04/04 

Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 18:00:36 +0000 (UTC)

George Hammond wrote:

>bv_schornak wrote:
>
>
>> George Hammond wrote:
>>
>>>bv_schornak:
>>>
>>>>George Hammond wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>bv_schornak wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>><large snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>George, it is common knowledge. I don't even have to think
>>>>>>about to know it. You don't need any degrees to know some-
>>>>>>thing. Having a degree doesn't include knowledge, it shows
>>>>>>that someone figured out how to get a degree - it does not
>>>>>>tell anything about the qualification.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>[Hammond]
>>>>>Well here's some bad news for you Bernie. I've just discovered that
>>>>>Prof. Bill Dembski's theory agrees with mine, in fact that my discovery
>>>>>proves his (well known controversial theory)... there are now TWO
>>>>>OF US claiming there is a scientific proof of God, check this out:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>See, George - I'm not interested in [Hammond]'s or Dembski's
>>>>metaphysical stuff. As long as one of you spreads his pseudo
>>>>theological phantasies, I just ignore it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>[Hammond]
>>>Yeah but see Bernhard.... I'm not interested in arguing with
>>>someone who is so educationally ignorant that he doesn't
>>>even KNOW what "G_uv" is.... I figure you're just an aggrevated
>>>crank.
>>>
>>>
>>Then we share the opinion that the other part is an
>>aggrevated crank. Most of the posters in this NG do
>>agree with my opinion. Whom have you got to come to
>>a balanced ratio? Don't say "Dembski", he will con-
>>tinue to ignore you as he ever did...
>>
>>
>>>>But: If either you
>>>>or Dembski tells hair raising lies about physical facts, I'm
>>>>here to stop any of you. If Dembski is the same ignoramus as
>>>>[Hammond], then we will have a lot of fun, I guess...
>>>>
>>>>Is this a clear statement?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>[Hammond]
>>>What's clear is that Hammond has more political clout than he
>>>had yesterday by virtue of his alliance with Dembski's
>>>(influential) work... and that obviously yanks the chain of a
>>>political harasser like you, eh Bernie?
>>>
>>>
>>George - you are really dumb, aren't you? Just read
>>what you've posted in the latest e-mail to Dembski.
>>Do you really think he will support your phantasies
>>because you support his phantasies? Don't beg me to
>>laugh about that, it's too sad...
>>

<Troll's "cut'n'paste" rantings snipped...>

Scusi, Senor - what did ye say?

George - please _stop trolling_ the NG with pointless
"cut'n'paste" rantings!

Greetings from Augsburg

Bernhard Schornak

Relevant Pages

  • Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
    ... George Hammond wrote: ... >>or Dembski tells hair raising lies about physical facts, ... Do you really think he will support your phantasies ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR is built on false assumptions....continued
    ... "GPS clock are in relative motion to every ground observer. ... "Picture two clocks A and B in intergalactic space that are in two ... Excellent support! ... that is only your unsupported opinion. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR is built on false assumptions....continued
    ... you can't seem to support either of your claims. ... What he said, knucklehead, and what I've said, and what other's have said is that the data proves that time dilation doesn't happen according to an object's absolute motion. ... "Picture two clocks A and B in intergalactic space that are in two ... Of course it's his opinion, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Breaking news (ot)
    ... The entire 'we' is the OBL audience and in fact includes non-Americans, some of whom take it seriously and some who do not. ... So by majority opinion we do not take this war seriously enough to wage our side of it. ... The northern alliance and the leader killed was soon to gain unequivocal support of the US and had been supported by Iran as well. ...
    (rec.motorcycles.harley)
  • Re: Whos Up, Whos Down In The Veepstakes
    ... opinion, is perpetuating an injustice. ... The bitter pill for survival needs a scapegoat and Fiorina was ... support for Clinton could even have been in 2006 when Clinton ... Fiorina did not and does not politically support Clinton. ...
    (soc.retirement)