Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
From: Alan (gper_at_mindless.com)
Date: 10/05/04
- Next message: jem: "Re: Define a clock"
- Previous message: jem: "Re: Define a clock"
- In reply to: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 4 Oct 2004 18:26:37 -0700
[snip]
> The point is, all these people want is one thing... to "disprove Darwin"..
> that's REALLY ALL THEY WANT TO DO. And the fact is,
> Hammond has given them the superweapon that does that.... so in
> the end... they will have to overlook their jealousy of Hammond
This has been gone over before. The "jealousy" is NOT REAL, Mr.
Hammond. How could it be, when NOBODY believes you? It doesn't make
sense. you KNOW it doesn't make sense, which leads to...
> in order to "get Darwin".... which is the only thing they're really
> interested
> in doing.... and I predict they're going to do it... and the SPoG will
> ride that tidal wave to fame and glory. ROFL
In a padded room? I can just picture it...
[snip sig]
- Next message: jem: "Re: Define a clock"
- Previous message: jem: "Re: Define a clock"
- In reply to: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
