Re: Question about God=G_uv
From: David (searchsubmit_at_mail.com)
Date: 10/05/04
- Next message: Paul B. Andersen: "Re: GPS calculations"
- Previous message: eleaticus: "Re: J. Advanced SR-cult Idiocies and Corruption"
- Maybe in reply to: stew dean: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- Reply: Moonshadao: "Re: Question about God=bull***"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 5 Oct 2004 13:24:43 -0700
If a tree falls...
by David Lawrence (September 29, 2004)
http://www.davidlawrence.biz/
This is the question:
If a tree falls in the forest, and no one is there to hear it, does it make a sound?
Here are some answers:
If a tree falls in the forest...
Catholicism: It fell for our sins.
Judaism: Oy, the tree fell, again?!
Buddhism: There is no tree.
Islam: Islam is not really about knocking over trees.
Fundamentalism: The tree was Evil.
Racism: That kind of tree is always falling.
Plagiarism: That kind of tree is always falling.
Defeatism: All the trees are going to fall.
Pessimism: That is the forest of the fallen tree.
Optimism: Almost all the trees are standing.
Capitalism: Let's sell the wood.
Globalism: Let's sell the wood, half way around the world.
Communism: Let's knock over all the other trees.
Socialism: Let's ask the other trees to fall.
Nepotism: Give the tree to my cousin.
Isolationism: That tree is none of our business, in fact, neither is the forest.
And the one that actually tries to answer the question asked, is...
Quantum Physics: Of course not, by definition.
(c) Copyright 2004 David Lawrence
"George Hammond" <nowhere@nomailspam.com> wrote in message news:<vJGdnV_HsrqCocfcRVn-qg@comcast.com>...
> "Barry OGrady" <god_freee_jones@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:gb0jl0992tn1ep86i7lrfbnlc1c98ot5tm@4ax.com...
> > On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 07:55:47 -0400, "George Hammond"
> <nowhere@nomailspam.com> wrote:
> >
> > >[Hammond]
> > >Bernie's anti-SPoG website is a joke. There isn't a whit of serious
> > >or competent science in it.
> >
> > I wonder if [Hammond] realises what he said there.
> > He is admitting that a page which contains his SPOG has no serious
> > or competent science in it.
> >
> >
> > -Barry
>
> [Hammond]
> Well at least I can be sure the Irish believe in God. Where did
> all these Chinese characters come from? Do you know if
> the Chinese actually believe in the "invisible person type God"
> that the West believes in.... or what? They talk a lot about
> the "Buddha Spirit"... is that their (invisible) God?
>
> I mean... whoever said "if a tree falls in the forrest does it
> make a sound" MUST know what God is... and that is
> a Buddhist Koan I believe.
>
>
>
> > ========
> > Web page: http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og
> > Atheist, radio scanner, LIPD information.
>
> ====================================
> SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
> 1st mirror site:
> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
> 2nd mirror site:
> http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
> new site (under construction):
> http://home.comcast.net/~proof-of-god
> ====================================
- Next message: Paul B. Andersen: "Re: GPS calculations"
- Previous message: eleaticus: "Re: J. Advanced SR-cult Idiocies and Corruption"
- Maybe in reply to: stew dean: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- Reply: Moonshadao: "Re: Question about God=bull***"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]