Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong

From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (ahmed.ouahi_at_welho.com)
Date: 10/06/04 

Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 20:52:58 +0300



--
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Pardon!
"Ahmed Ouahi, Architect" <ahmed.ouahi@welho.com> wrote in message
news:ck1b99$isf$1@nyytiset.pp.htv.fi...
>
> .............     ...The result of a mathematical development should be
> continuously checked against one's own intuition about what constitutes
> reasonable biological behavor.
>
> When such a check reveals disagreement, then the following possibilities
> must be considered:
>
> a-  A mistake has been made in the formal mathematical development .
>
> b-  The starting assumptions are incorrect and/or constitute a too drastic
> oversimplification .
>
> c-  One's own intuition about the biological field is inadequately
developed
> .
>
> d-  A penetrating new principle has been
> discovered!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.................        ...
-- Harvey J. Gold
>
> --
> Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
> Best Regards!
>
>
> "Mark Oliver" <markoliver@threexd.com> wrote in message
> news:CEV8d.19892$jj2.961840@news20.bellglobal.com...
> > Time is indeed an unsolved mystery that affects the entire Universe.
> > However, we can't dismiss that it is a force that overpowers all
> > manifestations of matter and energy, regardless of its physical
> > composition.
> >
> > Time is an energy force that manifests within matter and energy, which
> > are the same. In accordance with Newton's laws, when forces combine if
the
> > angle is oblique, a new force is formed from the determination of both.
> This
> > is the force of timegravity. Energy force will combine at oblique angles
> > the majority of the time, as a direct impact is a highly unlikely
> > probability, given 3-dimensional space.
> >
> > Timegravity has an effect upon all elements that cannot be reversed, as
> > there is no such concept of negative velocity.  Utilizing the
> > time/distance/speed triangle, the only way to make time reverse, is to
> > introduce negative velocity.  Therefore, time can only more in a
"forward"
> > direction, and its effect can never be reversed.  Example, if you add
> water
> > and cement together, you form concrete, as time manifests.  If you
smashed
> > the concrete to pieces, back to powder, you now have powdered concrete,
> and
> > you cannot add water again to make it concrete, as it is now powdered
> > concrete. It can't revert back to its original elements of cement and
> > water again. This is how time effects all matter and energy in a
> successive
> > "forward" direction.
> >
> > Einstein was incorrect about time travel and the warping of spacetime.
> Yet,
> > he was correct that time is relative to an observers frame of reference,
> as
> > time only exists in matter and energy, and is static and unified in
empty
> > space.
> >
> > Utilizing the time/distance/speed triangle, to travel between two points
> > (distance), you require velocity and time. These three elements are
> > necessary to create Dynamic Dimensional Distinctions (3XD), and this is
> the
> > origin of length, width, depth, as each MUST have a dimension of time,
> > distance and speed. Given the same distance, the faster you travel the
> value
> > of time becomes a smaller number, to keep the equation balanced.  If you
> > were to travel fast enough, then time would become such a small number,
it
> > could be deemed as almost instant.  However, to make time equal to zero,
> you
> > must travel at "C", as this is the maximum speed of energy.  However,
> since
> > energy is utilized to travel at "C", it is impossible to travel faster
> than
> > "C", to keep the law of the conservation of energy whole.
> >
> > So, if we were able to travel at "C", then time would be zero, and it
> could
> > be deemed as a significant amount or a minuscule amount, as zero now
> becomes
> > irreverent, and is equally opposite. But another problem arises in
physics
> > once again, that nothing can occupy the same space at the same time.  If
> > time was zero, you would travel from point to point in the same moment,
> > which is IMPOSSIBLE.  Thus, we can never travel at "C", but the closer
we
> > get to this velocity, time for the traveller would indeed dilate, as it
> > becomes such a small value.
> >
> > Time, is just a quantitative measurement of gravity. Time effects
energy,
> > gravity effects physical mass, both are the same.
> >
> > Mark Oliver
> >
> > You may find more about this at  www.threexd.com
> >
> >
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Young Earth Creationist Arguments. Do they realize how they look?
    ... the speed at which that energy travels. ... a travel speed as well as a frequency. ... is not dealing with creation. ... when Adam was dealt the blow that he now ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Capacitance and mass
    ... Any terrain map is a map of height. ... information for bicycle travel. ... the time-energy eikonal is the one to focus on for bicycle travel. ... energy factor can be dropped out in preliminary analyses, ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: Pushing off from the heels?
    ... lowering in which energy from the lost altitude is coupled into travel ... to the body altitude - most dancers now drop enough that they front ... If you want to invent your own private dance, ...
    (rec.arts.dance)
  • Re: Einstein wasnt all wrong
    ... > manifestations of matter and energy, ... > there is no such concept of negative velocity. ... > Einstein was incorrect about time travel and the warping of spacetime. ... However, to make time equal to zero, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: need help withb GR calculation
    ... "Ahmed Ouahi, Architect" wrote in message ... > increase of the the energy Ey h / cē, therefore, along that a cycle, the ... > increase of any inertia as along any mass, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)