Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong

From: Bill Hobba (bhobba_at_rubbish.net.au)
Date: 10/07/04 

Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 23:22:33 GMT

"AllYou!" <idaman@conversent.net> wrote in message
news:G7-dnTY8esEdqfjcRVn-qA@conversent.net...
>
> "Bill Hobba" <bhobba@rubbish.net.au> wrote in message
> news:GtZ8d.16524$5O5.9664@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> >
> > "Mark Oliver" <markoliver@threexd.com> wrote in message
> > news:CEV8d.19892$jj2.961840@news20.bellglobal.com...
> > > Time is indeed an unsolved mystery that affects the entire Universe.
> > > However, we can't dismiss that it is a force that overpowers all
> > > manifestations of matter and energy, regardless of its physical
> > > composition.
> > >
> > > Time is an energy force that manifests within matter and energy, which
> > > are the same.
> >
> > Time is simply what clocks measure.
>
> But we invented clocks.

Your heartbeat was invented?

Bill

So you mean that we invented something to measure
> something which is nothing more than that which what we invented measures?
> So what's a clock? The fundamental property of a clock is motion, a
> velocity through a distance, right? By what science do you claim that
this
> is somehow linked to the real property of nature we call *time*?
>
> > It is not some mystical 'energy force
> > that manifests within matter and energy'.]
>
> In fact, all it is is a figmant of our imagination. It all started with
the
> motion we now know is the roation of the Earth on it's axis and proceeded
> from there.
>
> > > In accordance with Newton's laws, when forces combine if the
> > > angle is oblique, a new force is formed from the determination of
both.
> > This
> > > is the force of timegravity. Energy force will combine at oblique
angles
> > > the majority of the time, as a direct impact is a highly unlikely
> > > probability, given 3-dimensional space.
> >
> > What a load of incohernet rubbish.
> >
> > Rest is same vein mecifully snipped.
>
> There you go again. That not to say that the post is or is not bull***,
> but simply that your need to call it so and respond nonetheless is
> indicative of your need to prove what you believe to be your superior
> intellect. Of course, all that does is betray your insecurity in this
> regard.
>

Quantcast