eleaticus
From: Dummy (dummy_at_dummy.net)
Date: 10/08/04
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Previous message: J.J. Simplicio: "Re: Is charge conserved between frames?"
- Next in thread: eleaticus: "Re: eleaticus"
- Reply: eleaticus: "Re: eleaticus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 03:35:24 GMT
E: Listen up, Androcles, I am not one of the True Believer SR-cult cretin
shits who treat you so shittily.
A: Ok, listening up.
E: Answer these question so we can preceed to your thesis on solid ground.
If you think my implied suggestions is wrong go back into 1905 and see what
it says.
E: A. AE intended x' to be a poitive constant, moving system value, the
distance of the moving mirror from the moving origin.
A: Defined by x' = x-vt. Some sample values
x' x v t
-2 -1 1 1
1 0 -1 1
E: B. he set v positive (or zero)?
A: It should be able to take any value. Actually it can only take zero.
E: C. it is t>=0 we should pay attention to?
A: Time doesn't run backwards.
E: D. if x' is positive (a distance, length) and so are v and t then x must
be
positive also?
A:
x' = x - v*t
2' = 3 - 1*1
1' = 2 - 1*1
-------0------1------2------3------4------5
----------------------|< vt >|
---------------0'-----1'-----2'-----3'-----4'-----5'
1' = 3 - 2*1
0------1------2------3------4------5
----------------------|< vt >|
---------------0'-----1'-----2'-----3'-----4'-----5'
Never mind my abrupt nature. It's just the way I come across.
Androcles.
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Previous message: J.J. Simplicio: "Re: Is charge conserved between frames?"
- Next in thread: eleaticus: "Re: eleaticus"
- Reply: eleaticus: "Re: eleaticus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]