Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation

From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (ahmed.ouahi_at_welho.com)
Date: 10/12/04 

Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 07:49:57 +0300

.............. ...For the time being, around the world concerning a
people, there is only amateurs along any field. For the simple reason, that
the life is too short, that they can arrive to accomplish anything the way
they want.

.............. ...However, according to your manners along your
behaviours it would be along a good step, if you could start to see how you
can arrive, first of to all, to demonstrate a just the most crucial matter
as a quantum, which it could be the anti-gravity.

.............. ...Therefore, before to step blindly to the gravity
itself, which it sounds, that it is already giving you the maximum of a
troubles. As it has had gives to any one who has had turns around that
subject in the history.

.............. ...However, a certainly you can arrive to arrange any
mathematical distinction of its behaviours, but you would never and ever
distinguish its behaviours as a being and as a strict controler of a
determined interferences mechanism along the universe, and this a simply
what is all about, definitely as amatter a
fact!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.................... 

--
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Think About That!
"George Hammond" <nowhere@nomailspam.com> wrote in message
news:woudnTgLb96Nx_bcRVn-pg@comcast.com...
> "Russell E. Rierson" <analog57@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:c410ffa5.0410102207.1a0a4fc8@posting.google.com...
> > "George Hammond" <nowhere@nomailspam.com> wrote in message
> news:<wL-dnS-gqJkxJ8vcRVn-qw@comcast.com>...
> >
> > > [Hammond]
> > > Berkeley was right, and 200 years later Mary Baker Eddy
> > > rediscovered Berkeley's principle and declared that
> > > "God is Mind" and "Heaven is a mental state" and founded
> > > one of the most successful and influential modern Christian
> > > Denominations on that theory.  She was right too.  And now
> > > HAMMOND has found the scientific proof of it.
> >
> > Does the SPoG agree with Frank Tipler's "Omega Point Theory"? :
>
> [Hammond]
>    SPoG is a "classical proof of God", not a "quantum proof of God".
> SPoG shows that the "classical invisible person God" of the
> Bible and other major faiths, is explained by CLASSICAL
> GENERAL RELATIVITY... and does not require quantum
> mechanics.
>    Tipler's theory is a "quantum speculation" about God.... therefore,
> Tipler's theory is not only conjectural, it is irrelevant to the SPoG
> which is a proof of the "classical person God of the major monotheistic
> faiths".
>    Of course, since the SPoG proves that "classical gravity" explains the
> "classical God" then that means that "quantum gravity" (when it is
> discovered) IS going to give us a "quantum theory of God"... but the
> theory of quantum gravity by all estimates is many years away.
> Moreover... the quantum theory will have to reduce to SPoG in the
> classical limit (the Bible being the classical limit).
>    Meanwhile, Frank Tipler doesn't have a CLUE as to the existence,
> or meaning, or proof of the "classical person God of Christianity"...
> to him it doesn't even exist, which makes him a theological LAYMAN
> and an AMATEUR in theology in the first place.
>    As for his "quantum god" speculations... I think they are purely
> METAPHORICAL, and since the quantum theory of God is now
> PROVEN to depend on the quantum theory of gravity which hasn't even
> been discovered yet..... Tipler's cosmological Omege-Point theory
> is clearly just as allegorical as the Bible.... the only difference being
> that the Bible writers actually knew what the classical God was
> (but couldn't prove it) so they deliberately wrote in allegory,
> metaphors and parables.  OTH, Tipler doesn't even know what the
> CLASSICAL GOD is, much less the QUANTUM GOD.... so his
> grand scenario is simply a daydream wrung out of his subconscious
> mind, pure and simple.
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > http://www.math.tulane.edu/%7Etipler/
> >
> > QUOTE:
> >
> > "The Omega Point Theory
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I have presented and defended my Omega Point Theory at length in my
> > book The Physics of Immortality (Doubleday, 1994), which is available
> > from Barnes and Noble or Amazon. As science, the Omega Point Theory
> > makes five basic claims about the universe:
> >
> > (1) the universe is spatially closed (has finite spatial size and has
> > the topology of a three-sphere),
> >
> > (2) there are no event horizons, implying the future c-boundary is a
> > point --- the Omega Point,
> >
> > (3) Life must eventually engulf the entire universe and control it,
> >
> > (4) the amount of information processed between now and the final
> > state is infinite,
> >
> > (5) the amount of information stored in the universe diverges to
> > infinity as the final state is approached.
> >
> > I can show that these five basic claims directly follow from the most
> > fundamental laws of physics: unitarity, general relativity with
> > attractive gravity, and the Bekenstein Bound (aka the Heisenberg
> > uncertainty principle). An outline of my proof is given on this web
> > page.
> >
> > I also argue that the ultimate future state of the universe, the Omega
> > Point, should be identified with God. I have presented my argument in
> > detail in my book The Physics of Immortality, but a main reason for my
> > identification Omega Point = God, comes from Exodus 3:14. In this
> > passage, God is speaking to Moses from the Burning Bush. God gives
> > Moses His Name: EHYEH ASHER EHYEH (in Hebrew, of course). God's Name
> > is best translated into English as I SHALL BE WHAT I SHALL BE. In
> > other words, God is telling Moses that His essence is future tense. If
> > we regard God as something Ultimate, then He is telling us that He is
> > the Ultimate Future. Hence my identification Omega Point = God. My
> > translation of EHYEH ASHER EHYEH is taken from the Oxford University
> > Study Bible (Revised Standard Version), but the great German religious
> > leader Martin Luther translated EHYEH ASHER EHYEH the same way into
> > German: ICH WERDE SEIN, DER ICH SEIN WERDE. Luther's translation of
> > the Bible was to the German language as the King James version was to
> > the English language.
> >
> > I am also including on this web page two critical defenses of both my
> > scientific argument and my theological argument.
> >
> > My science is defended by Dr. David Deutsch, a physicist at Oxford
> > University. In January of 1998, Deutsch was awarded the Dirac Medal
> > for his invention of the quantum computer. Deutsch's defense of my
> > science is taken from his brilliant book The Fabric of Reality
> > (Penguin Books, 1997). This book is available from either Barnes and
> > Noble or Amazon. I can strongly recommend this book for its
> > presentation of the Many-Worlds Interpretation, the physics upon which
> > the quantum computer is based. In fact, I agree with almost everything
> > Deutsch says in his book. Where we disagree, I believe it is only
> > because Deutsch has rejected his own theory! I shall reproduce here
> > (with permission) most of the 14th Chapter of Deutsch's book.
> >
> > My theology is defended by Professor Wolfhart Pannenberg, a theologian
> > at the University of Munich, Germany. Professor Pannenberg has been
> > called "the most brilliant living theological mind". He has been
> > termed "one of the three great theologians of the 20th century". He
> > holds five honorary doctors of divinity degrees. He is eminently
> > qualified to judge theology. Professor Pannenberg's paper, which I
> > reproduce here (with his permission) was originally presented at a
> > conference on my book, held in June of 1997 in Innsbruck, Austria.
> >
> > Amusingly, the theologian Pannenberg is dubious about some of my
> > physics, and the physicist Deutsch doesn't like my theology! As you
> > will read, Pannenberg does not like the Many- Worlds Interpretation
> > (which Deutsch --- and I --- believe in because it is required by
> > quantum mechanics). Deutsch defends the MWI in his book. I am placing
> > on this web page another defense of the MWI, entitled "Quantum
> > Nonlocality Does Not Exist," which shows that locality --- a
> > fundamental fact of relativity --- is restored to physics by the MWI.
> > I might add that most of the great physicists --- Richard Feynman,
> > Murray Gell-Mann, Steven Weinberg, Stephen Hawking, for examples ---
> > have publicly announced their support for the MWI.
> >
> > I have included my replies to Deutsch's criticisms of my theology in
> > the excerpts from Deutsch's book. Deutsch does not like the idea of
> > God as the Ultimate Future, but Pannenberg many years ago concluded,
> > as I have, that the Bible says God is the Ultimate Future."
> >
>
> ====================================
>    SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
>         1st mirror site:
> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
>         2nd mirror site:
> http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
>      new site (under construction):
> http://home.comcast.net/~proof-of-god
> ====================================
>
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation
    ... book The Physics of Immortality, which is available ... the universe is spatially closed (has finite spatial size and has ... should be identified with God. ... My theology is defended by Professor Wolfhart Pannenberg, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Its OK if you dont believe in GOD but............
    ... >> You ask us to explain our beliefs. ... Just because the quantum domain does not follow your ... >> Quantum Physics opens up the possibility of ... >> I guess what you want to know is how GOD does and doesn't exist at the ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
    ... > existence of a Creator God. ... > truly exists, we will see evidence of God in quantum physics, which is ... > where h is Planck's constant, m.e is the mass of the electron, w.C is ... is the mass associated with the Aether. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: God and Photon.
    ... Following so called "physics" the whole paragraph (God and Photon) ... If quantum of light moving with speed c=1 falls ...
    (rec.org.mensa)
  • Re: God and Photon.
    ... Following so called "physics" the whole paragraph (God and Photon) ... If quantum of light moving with speed c=1 falls ...
    (talk.origins)